The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 1 (of 4) : $b Separate memoirsBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 1 (of 4) : $b Separate memoirs
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
Die Discogastrula unsers Knochenfisches in diesem Stadium
der vollen Ausbildung stellt nunmehr eine kreisrunde Kappe
dar, welche wie ein gefüttertes Mützchen fast die ganze
obere Hemisphäre der hyalinen Dotterkugel eng anliegend
bedeckt (Fig. 65). Der Ueberzug des Mützchens entspricht dem
Exoderm (_e_), sein Futter dem Entoderm (_i_). Ersteres
besteht aus drei Schichten von kleineren Zellen, letzteres
aus einer einzigen Schicht von grösseren Zellen. Die
Exodermzellen (Fig. 77) messen 0.006 - 0.009 Mm., und haben
ein klares, sehr feinkörniges Protoplasma. Die
Entodermzellen (Fig. 78) messen 0.02 - 0.03 Mm. und ihr
Protoplasma ist mehr grobkörnig und trüber. Letztere bilden
auch den grössten Theil des Randwulstes, den wir nunmehr als
Urmundrand der Gastrula, als "_Properistoma_" oder auch als
"RUSCONI'schen After" bezeichnen können. Der letztere
umfasst die Dotterkugel, welche die ganze Urdarmhöhle
ausfüllt und weit aus der dadurch verstopften
Urmund-Oeffnung vorragt.
Footnote 165: The references in this quotation are to the
figures in the original.
My objections to the view so lucidly explained in the passage just quoted,
fall under two heads.
(1) That the facts of development of the meroblastic eggs of vertebrates,
are not in accordance with the views here advanced.
(2) That even if these views be accepted as representing the actual facts
of development, the explanation offered of these facts would not be
satisfactory.
* * * * *
Professor Haeckel's views are absolutely incompatible with the facts of
Elasmobranch development, if my investigations are correct.
The grounds of the incompatibility may be summed up under the following
heads:
(1) In Elasmobranchii the hypoblast cells occupy, even before the close of
segmentation, the position which, on Professor Haeckel's view, they ought
only eventually to take up after being involuted from the whole periphery
of the blastoderm.
(2) There is no sign at any period of an invagination of the periphery of
the blastoderm, and the only structure (the embryonic rim) which could be
mistaken for such an invagination is confined to a very limited arc.
(3) The growth of cells to form the floor of the segmentation cavity, which
ought to be part of this general invagination from the periphery, is mainly
due to a formation of cells from the yolk.
It is this ingrowth of cells for the floor of the segmentation cavity
which, I am inclined to think, Professor Haeckel has mistaken for a general
invagination in the Osseous Fish he has investigated.
(4) Professor Haeckel fails to give an account of the asymmetry of the
blastoderm; an asymmetry which is unquestionably also present in the
blastoderm of most Osseous Fishes, though not noticed by Professor Haeckel
in the investigations recorded in his paper.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account