The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: InvertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Invertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
Although by the close of the segmentation the protoplasm has travelled
to a superficial position, it may be noted that at first it forms a
small mass in the centre of the egg, and only eventually assumes its
peripheral situation. It is moreover clear that in the Spider's ovum
there is, so to speak, an attempt at a complete segmentation, which
however only results in an arrangement of the constituents of the ovum
in masses round each nucleus, and not in a true division of the ovum
into distinct segments.
It seems very probable that Ludwig's observations on the segmentation
of Spiders only hold good for species with comparatively small ova.
In connection with the segmentation of the Insects' ovum and allied
types it should be mentioned that Bobretzky, to whose observations we
are largely indebted for our knowledge of this subject, holds somewhat
different views from those adopted in the text. He regards the nuclei
surrounded by protoplasm, which are produced by the division of the
primitive segmentation nucleus, as so many distinct cells. These cells
are supposed to move about freely in the yolk, which acts as a kind of
intercellular medium. This view does not commend itself to me. It is
opposed to my own observations on similar nuclei in the Spiders. It
does not fit in with our knowledge of the nature of the ovum, and it
cannot be reconciled with the segmentation of such types as Spiders or
even Eupagurus, with which the segmentation in Insects is undoubtedly
closely related.
The majority if not all the cases in which a central yolk mass is
formed occur in the Arthropoda, in which group centrolecithal ova are
undoubtedly in a majority. In Alcyonium palmatum the segmentation
appears however to resemble that of many insects.
One or two peculiar varieties in the segmentation of ova of this type
may be spoken of here. The first one I shall mention is detailed in
the important paper of E. Van Beneden and Bessels which I have already
so often had occasion to quote: it is characteristic of the eggs of
most of the species of Chondracanthus, a genus of parasitic
Crustaceans. The ovum divides in the usual way but somewhat
irregularly into 2, 4, 8 segments which meet in a central yolk mass;
but after the third division instead of each segment dividing into two
equal parts it divides _at once_ into four, and the division into
four having started, reappears at every successive division. Thus the
number of the segments at successive periods is 2, 4, 8, 32, 128, etc.
In another peculiar case, an instance of which[64] is afforded by
_Asellus aquaticus_, after each of the earlier segmentations all
the segments fuse and become indistinguishable, but at the succeeding
segmentation double the number of segments appears.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account