The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: InvertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 2 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Invertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
Although, as has been already stated, it does not seem possible to
have a true meroblastic segmentation in centrolecithal ova, it does
nevertheless appear probable that the apparent cases of a meroblastic
segmentation in the Arthropoda are derivatives of this type of
segmentation. The manner in which the one type might pass into the
other may perhaps be explained by the segmentation in _Asellus
aquaticus_[65]. In this ovum large segments are at first formed
around a central yolk mass, in the peculiar manner mentioned in the
previous paragraph, but at the close of the first period of
segmentation minute cells, which eventually form a superficial
blastoderm, are produced from the yolk cells. They do not however
appear at once round the whole periphery of the egg, but at first only
on the ventral surface and later on the dorsal surface. If the amount
of food-yolk in the egg were to increase so as to render the formation
of the yolk cells impossible, and at the same time the formation of
the blastodermic cells were to take place at the commencement, instead
of towards the close of the segmentation, a mass of protoplasm with a
nucleus might first appear at the surface on the future ventral side
of the egg, then divide in the usual way for meroblastic ova, and give
rise to a layer of cells gradually extending round to the dorsal
surface. A meroblastic segmentation might perhaps be even more easily
derived from the type found in Insects. It is probable that the cases
of Scorpio, Mysis, Oniscus, the parasitic Isopoda, and some parasitic
Copepoda belong to this category; and it may be noticed that in these
cases the blastopore would be situated on the dorsal and not on the
ventral side of the ovum. The morphological importance of this latter
fact will appear in the sequel.
[64] [65] Ed. van Beneden, _Bull. Acad. Belgique_, Vol. XXVIII.
1869.
The results arrived at in the present section may be shortly restated
in the following way.
(1) A comparatively small number of ova contain very little or no
food-yolk embedded in their protoplasm; and have what food-yolk may be
present distributed uniformly. In such ova the segmentation is
regular. They may be described as alecithal ova.
(2) The distribution of food-yolk in the protoplasm of the ovum
exercises an important influence on the segmentation.
The rapidity with which any part of an ovum segments varies _ceteris
paribus_ with the relative amount of protoplasm it contains; and
the size of the segments formed varies inversely to the relative
amount of protoplasm. When the proportion of protoplasm in any part of
an ovum becomes extremely small, segmentation does not occur in that
part.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account