The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
That there is a general homology appears on the other hand hardly open
to doubt.
The primary layers are usually continuous with each other, near one or
both (when both are present) the openings of the alimentary tract.
As a rule an oral and anal section of the alimentary tract--the
stomodæum and proctodæum--are derived from the epiblast; but the
limits of both these sections are so variable, sometimes even in
closely allied forms, that it is difficult to avoid the conclusion
that there is a border-land between the epiblast and hypoblast, which
appears by its development to belong in some forms to the epiblast and
in other forms to the hypoblast. If this is not the case it is
necessary to admit that there are instances in which a very large
portion of the alimentary canal is phylogenetically an epiblastic
structure. In some of the Isopods, for example, the stomodæum and
proctodæum give rise to almost the whole of the alimentary canal with
its appendages, except the liver.
The origin of the Mesoblast. A diploblastic condition of the organism
preceded, as we have seen, the triploblastic. The epiblast during the
diploblastic condition was, as appears from such forms as Hydra,
especially the sensory and protective layer, while the hypoblast was
the secretory and assimilating layer; both layers giving rise to
muscular elements. It must not, however, be supposed that in the early
diploblastic ancestors there was a complete differentiation of
function, but there is reason to think that both the primary layers
retained an indefinite capacity for developing into any form of
tissue[124]. The fact of the triploblastic condition being later than
the diploblastic proves in a conclusive way that the mesoblast is a
derivative of one or both the primary layers. In the Coelenterata we
can study the actual origin from the two primary layers of various
forms of tissue which in the higher types are derived from the
mesoblast[125]. This fact, as well as general _à priori_
considerations, conclusively prove that the mesoblast did not at first
originate as a mass of independent cells between the two primary
layers, but that in the first instance it gradually arose as
differentiations of the two layers, and that its condition in the
embryo as an independent layer of undifferentiated cells is a
secondary condition, brought about by the general tendency towards a
simplification of development, and a retardation of histological
differentiation[126].
[124] The Hertwigs (No. 270) have for instance shewn that nervous
structures are developed in the hypoblast in the Actinozoa and
other Coelenterata.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account