The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: VertebrataBalfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Science
The works of Francis Maitland Balfour, Volume 3 (of 4) : $b A treatise on comparative embryology: Vertebrata
Balfour, Francis M. (Francis Maitland)
Embryology; Zoology
[125] There is considerable confusion in the use of the names for
the embryonic layers. In some cases various tissues formed by
differentiations of the primary layers have been called
mesoblast. Schultze, and more recently the Hertwigs, have pointed
out the inconvenience of this nomenclature. In the case of the
Coelenterata it is difficult to decide in certain instances
(_e.g._ Sympodium) whether the cells which give rise to a
particular tissue of the adult are to be regarded as forming a
mesoblast, _i.e._ a middle undifferentiated layer of cells, or
whether they arise as already histologically differentiated
elements from one of the primary layers. The attempt to
distinguish by a special nomenclature the epiblast and hypoblast
after and before the separation of the mesoblast, which has been
made by Allen Thomson (No. 1), appears incapable of being
consistently applied, though it is convenient to distinguish a
primary and a secondary hypoblast. A proposal of the Hertwigs to
adopt special names for the outer and inner limiting membranes of
the adult, and for the interposed mass of organs, appears to me
unnecessary.
[126] The causes which give rise to a retardation of histological
differentiation will be dealt with in the second part of this
chapter which deals with larval characters and larval forms.
The Hertwigs have recently attempted (No. 271) to distinguish two
types of differentiation of the mesoblast, viz. (1) a direct
differentiation from the primitive epithelial cells; (2) a
differentiation from primitively indifferent cells budded off into the
gelatinous matter between the two primary layers.
It is quite possible that this distinction may be well founded, but no
conclusive evidence of the occurrence of the second process has yet
been adduced. The Ctenophora are the type upon which special stress is
laid, but the early passage of amoeboid cells into the gelatinous
tissue, which subsequently become muscular, is very probably an
embryonic abbreviation; and it is quite possible that these cells may
phylogenetically have originated from epithelial cells provided with
contractile processes passing through the gelatinous tissue.
The conversion of non-embryonic connective-tissue cells into muscle
cells in the higher types has been described, but very much more
evidence is required before it can be accepted as a common occurrence.
In addition to the probably degraded Dicyemidæ and Orthonectidæ, the
Coelenterata are the only group in which a true mesoblast is not
always present. In other words, the Coelenterata are the only group in
which there is not found in the embryo an undifferentiated group of
cells from which the majority of the organs situated between the
epidermis and the alimentary epithelium are developed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account