The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21Berkeley, George
Philosophy
The Works of George Berkeley. Vol. 1 of 4: Philosophical Works, 1705-21
Berkeley, George
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800
Lines & points conceiv’d as terminations different ideas from those
conceiv’d absolutely.
Every position alters a line.
(M366) Blind man at 1st would not take colours to be without his mind; but
colours would seem to be in the same place with the coloured extension:
therefore extension wd not seem to be without the mind.
All visible concentric circles whereof the eye is the centre are
absolutely equal.
Infinite number—why absurd—not rightly solv’d by Locke(216).
Qu. how ’tis possible we should see flats or right lines?
Qu. why the moon appears greatest in the horizon(217)?
Qu. why we see things erect when painted inverted(218)?
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(M367) Question put by Mr. Deering touching the thief and paradise.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(M368) Matter tho’ allowed to exist may be no greater than a pin’s head.
Motion is proportionable to space described in given time.
Velocity not proportionable to space describ’d in given time.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
(M369) No active power but the Will: therefore Matter, if it exists,
affects us not(219).
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Magnitude when barely taken for the _ratio partium extra partes_, or
rather for co-existence & succession, without considering the parts
co-existing & succeeding, is infinitely, or rather indefinitely, or not at
all perhaps, divisible, because it is itself infinite or indefinite. But
definite, determined magnitudes, i.e. lines or surfaces consisting of
points whereby (together wth distance & position) they are determin’d, are
resoluble into those points.
Again. Magnitude taken for co-existence and succession is not all
divisible, but is one simple idea.
Simple ideas include no parts nor relations—hardly separated and
considered in themselves—nor yet rightly singled by any author. Instance
in power, red, extension, &c.
(M370) Space not imaginable by any idea received from sight—not imaginable
without body moving. Not even then necessarily existing (I speak of
infinite space)—for wt the body has past may be conceiv’d annihilated.
(M371) Qu. What can we see beside colours? what can we feel beside hard,
soft, cold, warm, pleasure, pain?
Qu. Why not taste & smell extension?
Qu. Why not tangible & visible extensions thought heterogeneous
extensions, so well as gustable & olefactible perceptions thought
heterogeneous perceptions? or at least why not as heterogeneous as blue &
red?
Moon wn horizontal does not appear bigger as to visible extension than at
other times; hence difficulties and disputes about things seen under equal
angles &c. cease.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
All _potentiæ_ alike indifferent.
A. B. Wt does he mean by his _potentia_? Is it the will, desire, person,
or all or neither, or sometimes one, sometimes t’other?
No agent can be conceiv’d indifferent as to pain or pleasure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account