The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 03Dryden, John
General
The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 03
Dryden, John
English drama -- 17th century
Our author acknowledges, that this play of "The Mock Astrologer" is
founded on "_Le feint Astrologue_," by the younger Corneille, which he,
in his turn, had imitated from "_El Astrologo fingido_" of Calderon. But
Dryden has also laid Moliere under contribution. Most part of the
quarrelling scene betwixt Wildblood and Jacintha, in the fourth act, is
literally copied from that betwixt Lucile Eraste, Marinette, and Gros
René, in "_Le Depit Amoureux_." The absurd loquacity of Don Alonzo, and
his friend's mode of silencing him, by ringing a bell in his ears, is
imitated from the scene betwixt Albert and Metaphraste, in the same
play; and, it must be allowed, it is an expedient which might be more
decently resorted to against an inundation of nonsense from a pedantic
schoolmaster, as in Moliere, than to stop the mouth of a noble old
Spaniard, the uncle of Don Lopez' mistress. The play itself is more
lively than most of Dryden's comedies. Wildblood and Jacintha are far
more pleasant than their prototypes, Celadon and Florimel; and the
Spanish bustle of the plot is well calculated to keep up the attention.
The character of Aurelia was perhaps suggested by the "_Precieuses
Ridicules_" of Moliere, but cannot, with any justice, be said to be
copied from them. The Preface contains some excellent remarks on the old
comedy. There is also an elaborate defence, the first our poet deigned
to make, against the charge of plagiarism. On this point he quotes the
words of Charles II., who had only desired, that they, who accused
Dryden of theft, would steal him such plays as Dryden's: And he
vindicates the right of an author to take his plot where he could best
find it, in history or romance, providing that the conduct and
disposition of the action, with the dialogue, character, and poetical
ornaments, were original. Our author's use of the terms and technical
phrases of judicial astronomy intimate his acquaintance with that
pretended science, in which he is known to have placed some confidence.
The "Mock Astrologer" appears to have been acted and published in 1668.
THE
PREFACE.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account