The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 14Dryden, John
General
The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 14
Dryden, John
English literature
But the argument of the work, that is to say, its principal action,
the œconomy and disposition of it; these are the things which
distinguish copies from originals. The poet, who borrows nothing from
others, is yet to be born; he and the Jews' Messias will come together.
There are parts of the Æneïs, which resemble some parts both of the
Ilias and of the Odysses; as, for example, Æneas descended into hell,
and Ulysses had been there before him; Æneas loved Dido, and Ulysses
loved Calypso; in few words, Virgil hath imitated Homer's Odysses in
his first six books, and, in his six last, the Ilias. But from hence
can we infer, that the two poets write the same history? Is there no
invention in some other parts of Virgil's Æneïs? The disposition of so
many various matters, is not that his own? From what book of Homer
had Virgil his episode of Nisus and Euryalus, of Mezentius and Lausus?
From whence did he borrow his design of bringing Æneas into Italy? of
establishing the Roman empire on the foundations of a Trojan colony? to
say nothing of the honour he did his patron, not only in his descent
from Venus, but in making him so like her in his best features, that
the goddess might have mistaken Augustus for her son. He had indeed the
story from common fame, as Homer had his from the Egyptian priestess.
_Æneadûm genetrix_ was no more unknown to Lucretius, than to him. But
Lucretius taught him not to form his hero, to give him piety or valour
for his manners, and both in so eminent a degree, that, having done
what was possible for man to save his king and country, his mother was
forced to appear to him, and restrain his fury, which hurried him to
death in their revenge. But the poet made his piety more successful;
he brought off his father and his son; and his gods witnessed to his
devotion, by putting themselves under his protection, to be replaced
by him in their promised Italy. Neither the invention nor the conduct
of this great action were owing to Homer, or any other poet. It is one
thing to copy, and another thing to imitate from nature. The copier
is that servile imitator, to whom Horace gives no better a name than
that of animal; he will not so much as allow him to be a man. Raphael
imitated nature; they who copy one of Raphael's pieces, imitate but
him; for his work is their original. They translate him, as I do
Virgil; and fall as short of him, as I of Virgil. There is a kind of
invention in the imitation of Raphael; for, though the thing was in
nature, yet the idea of it was his own. Ulysses travelled; so did
Æneas: but neither of them were the first travellers; for Cain went
into the land of Nod before they were born: and neither of the poets
ever heard of such a man. If Ulysses had been killed at Troy, yet Æneas
must have gone to sea, or he could never have arrived in Italy. But
the designs of the two poets were as different as the courses of their
heroes; one went home, and the other sought a home. To return to my
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account