The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17Dryden, John
General
The works of John Dryden, now first collected in eighteen volumes. Volume 17
Dryden, John
English literature
What farther quarrel he can have against the lady in this particular, I
know not, unless it be upon the bishop of Winchester’s account; namely,
that she refused to advise with him, and admitted the two others[70]
to a conference; and what reason she had for so doing, if I were as
penetrating as my author, I should undertake to demonstrate by the
infallible evidence of circumstances and inferences: but since the
parties are dead, and so long since, I will not give my own opinion why
she refused him, and of what principles she might possibly have thought
him. At present I will not trouble myself farther with that prelate of
rich memory, whom I warrant you our author would not commend so much for
his great abilities and willingness to resolve the lady’s doubts, if he
had not some journey-work for him to do hereafter; neither will I meddle
much with the long impertinent story of his letter to the duchess, and
her silence at Farnham, where she would not consult him in any of her
doubts. Whatever great matters are made of these by our answerer, she had
a very sufficient reason for not asking his advice, as will instantly
be made appear. But now our author is at another of his dodging tricks,
comparing times and dates of letters, the bishop’s bearing date the 24th
of January, that very year in which she changed; but that he may not
puzzle himself too much in reckoning, I will unriddle the matter of fact
to him, which I have from a most authentic hand. The duke and duchess
were at Farnham in the beginning of September, where they continued
about three days, in the year 1670. Her highness’s paper bears date the
20th of August, 1670; by which it is manifest, that it was written twelve
or fourteen days before her visit to the bishop. Now where, I beseech
you, is the wonder, that she spoke nothing to him concerning any points
of a religion in which she was already satisfied? Would any man ask
another—what’s o’clock, after he had been just looking upon a sun-dial?
So that all his aggravations dwindle at length into this poor inference,
that it is evident she did not make use of the ordinary means for her own
satisfaction; at least (mark how he mollifies, for fear of being trapped)
as to those bishops who had known her longest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account