------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transcriber’s Note: This version of the text cannot represent certain typographical effects. Italics are delimited with the ‘_’ character as _italic_. Footnotes have been moved to follow the paragraphs in which they are referenced. Minor errors, attributable to the printer, have been corrected. Please see the transcriber’s note at the end of this text for details regarding the handling of any textual issues encountered during its preparation. BOHN’S CLASSICAL LIBRARY. ------- THE WORKS OF PLATO, LITERALLY TRANSLATED. THE WORKS OF PLATO. -------------- A NEW AND LITERAL VERSION, CHIEFLY FROM THE TEXT OF STALLBAUM. VOL. I. CONTAINING THE APOLOGY OF SOCRATES, CRITO, PHÆDO, GORGIAS, PROTAGORAS, PHÆDRUS, THEÆTETUS, EUTHYPHRON, AND LYSIS. BY HENRY CARY, M.A. WORCESTER COLLEGE, OXFORD. LONDON: HENRY G. BOHN, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1854. TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE. -------------- The only version of the entire works of Plato, which has appeared in the English language, is that published by Taylor; in which nine of the Dialogues previously translated by Floyer Sydenham are introduced. Taylor’s portion of the work is far from correct, and betrays an imperfect knowledge of Greek: that by Sydenham is much better, and evidently the work of a scholar, but in many instances, and those chiefly where difficulties present themselves, he obscures his author’s meaning by too great amplification. Translations of several detached Dialogues have appeared at various times, but of those which have fallen into my hands none appear to me deserving of notice, with the exception of a little volume containing the Phædrus, Lysis, and Protagoras, by Mr. J. Wright, of Trinity College, Cambridge, the production of a promising scholar. In the volume now offered to the public, I have endeavoured to keep as closely to the original as the idioms of the two languages would allow. In the introduction to each Dialogue I have contented myself with giving a brief outline of the arguments; sufficient, I trust, to enable a reader not familiar with the rigid dialectics of Plato to follow the chain of his reasoning, and catch the points at which he so frequently diverges from, and again returns to, the main subject of each Dialogue.