_Answer_. No one can control his own opinion or his own belief. My belief was forced upon me by my surroundings. I am the product of all circumstances that have in any way touched me. I believe in this world. I have no confidence in any religion promising joys in another world at the expense of liberty and happiness in this. At the same time, I wish to give others all the rights I claim for myself. _Question_. If I asked for proofs for your theory, what would you furnish? _Answer_. The experience of every man who is honest with himself, every fact that has been discovered in nature. In addition to these, the utter and total failure of all religionists in all countries to produce one particle of evidence showing the existence of any supernatural power whatever, and the further fact that the people are not satisfied with their religion. They are continually asking for evidence. They are asking it in every imaginable way. The sects are continually dividing. There is no real religious serenity in the world. All religions are opponents of intellectual liberty. I believe in absolute mental freedom. Real religion with me is a thing not of the head, but of the heart; not a theory, not a creed, but a life. _Question_. What punishment, then, is inflicted upon man for his crimes and wrongs committed in this life? _Answer_. There is no such thing as intellectual crime. No man can commit a mental crime. To become a crime it must go beyond thought. _Question_. What punishment is there for physical crime? _Answer_. Such punishment as is necessary to protect society and for the reformation of the criminal. _Question_. If there is only punishment in this world, will not some escape punishment? _Answer_. I admit that all do not seem to be punished as they deserve. I also admit that all do not seem to be rewarded as they deserve; and there is in this world, apparently, as great failures in matter of reward as in matter of punishment. If there is another life, a man will be happier there for acting according to his highest ideal in this. But I do not discern in nature any effort to do justice. --_The Post_, Washington, D. C., 1878. MRS. VAN COTT, THE REVIVALIST _Question_. I see, Colonel, that in an interview published this morning, Mrs. Van Cott (the revivalist), calls you "a poor barking dog." Do you know her personally? _Answer_. I have never met or seen her. _Question_. Do you know the reason she applied the epithet? _Answer_. I suppose it to be the natural result of what is called vital piety; that is to say, universal love breeds individual hatred. _Question_. Do you intend making any reply to what she says? _Answer_. I have written her a note of which this is a copy: _Buffalo, Feb. 24th, 1878._ MRS. VAN COTT;