Presbyterian Church -- Sermons; Sermons, English; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 17th century
If ye ask what he is, we may glance at some notions and expressions to
hold him out. In relation to the creatures, we may call him Creator,
Redeemer, Light, Life, Omnipotent, Good, Merciful, Just, and such like;
but if you ask, what is his proper name in relation to himself, _ipse
novit_, himself knows that, we must be silent, and silence in such a
subject is the rarest eloquence. But let us hear what the Lord himself
speaks, in answer to this question. If any can tell, sure he himself knows
his own name best. “I am (saith he) what I am.” _Sum qui sum._ “Go tell
them that I AM hath sent thee.” A strange answer, but an answer only
pertinent for such a question. What should Moses make of this? What is he
the wiser of his asking? Indeed he might be the wiser, it might teach him
more by silence than all human eloquence could instruct him by speaking.
His question was curious, and behold an answer short and dark, to confound
vain and presumptuous mortality,—“I am what I am,” an answer that does not
satisfy curiosity, for it leaves room for the first question, and What art
thou? But abundant to silence faith and sobriety, that it shall ask no
more, but sit down and wonder.
There are three things I conceive imported in this name: God’s
unsearchableness, God’s unchangeableness, and God’s absoluteness. His
ineffability, his eternity, and his sovereignty and independent
subsistence, upon whom all other things depend. I say,
1. His unsearchableness. You know it is our manner of speech when we would
cover any thing from any, and not answer any thing distinctly to them, we
say, “It is what it is, I have said what I have said, I will not make you
wiser of it.” Here then is the fittest notion you can take up God into, to
find him unsearchable beyond all understanding, beyond all speaking. The
more ye speak or think, to find him always beyond what ye speak or think,
whatever you discover of him, to conceive that infiniteness is beyond
that, _ad finem cujus pertransire non potest_, the end of which you cannot
reach, that he is an unmeasurable depth, a boundless ocean of perfection,
that you can neither sound the bottom of it, nor find the breadth of it!
Can a child wade the sea, or take it up in the hollow of its hand?
Whenever any thing of God is seen, he is seen a wonder, “Wonderful is the
name he is known by”. All our knowledge reacheth no further than
admiration. “Who is like unto thee?” Exod. xv. 11, Psalm lxxxix. 6, 7, and
admiration speaks ignorance. The greatest attainment of knowledge reacheth
but to such a question as this, Who is like to thee? to know only that he
is not like any other thing that we know, but not to know what he is. And
the different degrees of knowledge are but in more admiration or less at
his unconceivableness, and in more or less affection expressed in such
pathetic interrogations, O who is like the Lord? How excellent is his
name? Here is the greatest degree of saints knowledge here away, to ask
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account