5. But some may possibly ask, Does not the apostle say, [31]_This is the love of_ God, _that we keep his commandments_? Yea; and this is the love of our neighbour also, in the same sense as it is the love of God. But what would you infer from hence? That the keeping the outward commandments is all that is implied in loving God with all your heart, with all your mind, and soul, and strength, and in loving your neighbour as yourself? That the love of God is not an affection of the soul, but merely an _outward service_? And that the love of our neighbour is not a disposition of heart, but barely a course of _outward works_! To mention so wild an interpretation of the apostle’s words, is sufficiently to confute it. The plain indisputable meaning of that text is, _This is the_ sign or proof of the _love of_ God, of our keeping the first and great commandment, to keep all the rest of his commandments. For true love, if it be once shed abroad in our heart, will constrain us so to do: since whosoever loves God with all his heart, cannot but serve him with all his strength. 5. A second fruit then of the love of God, (so far as it can be distinguished from it) is universal obedience to him we love, and conformity to his will: obedience to all the commands of God, internal and external: obedience of the heart and of the life, in every temper, and in all manner of conversation. And one of the tempers most obviously implied herein is, the being _zealous of good works_; the hungring and thirsting to do good, in every possible kind, unto all men; the rejoicing to _spend and be spent for them_, for every child of man, not looking for any recompence in this world, but only in the resurrection of the just.