The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 04 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 04 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
2. But what is self-denial? Wherein are we to deny ourselves? And
whence does the necessity of this arise? I answer, the will of God is
the supreme, unalterable rule for every intelligent creature: equally
binding every angel in heaven, and every man upon earth. Nor can it
be otherwise: this is the natural, necessary result of the relation
between creatures and their Creator. But if the will of God be our
one rule of action, in every thing, great and small, it follows by
undeniable consequence, that we are not to do our own will in any
thing. Here therefore we see at once the nature, with the ground and
reason of self-denial. We see the nature of self-denial: it is the
denying or refusing to follow our own will, from a conviction that the
will of God is the only rule of action to us. And we see the reason
thereof, because we are creatures; because _it is he that hath made
us and not ourselves_.
3. This reason for self-denial must hold, even with regard to the
angels of God in heaven: and with regard to man, innocent and holy, as
he came out of the hands of his Creator. But a farther reason for it
arises, from the condition wherein all men are since the fall. We are
all now _shapen in wickedness, and in sin did our mother conceive us_.
Our nature is altogether corrupt, in every power and faculty. And our
will, depraved equally with the rest, is wholly bent to indulge our
natural corruption. On the other hand, it is the will of God, that we
resist and counter-act that corruption, not at some times, or in some
things only, but at all times, and in all things. Here therefore is a
farther ground for constant and universal self-denial.
4. To illustrate this a little further. The will of God is a path
leading straight to God. The will of man which once ran parallel
with it, is now another path, not only different from it, but in our
present state directly contrary to it. It leads from God; if therefore
we walk in the one, we must necessarily quit the other. We cannot walk
in both. Indeed a man _of faint heart and feeble hands_, may _go in
two ways_, one after the other. But he cannot walk in two ways at
the same time: he cannot at one and the same time, follow his own
will, and follow the will of God; he must chuse the one or the other:
denying God’s will, to follow his one, or deny himself, to follow the
will of God.
5. Now it is undoubtedly pleasing for the time, to follow our own
will, by indulging in any instance that offers, the corruption of our
nature. But the following it in any thing, we so far strengthen the
perverseness of our will: and by indulging it, we continually increase
the corruption of our nature. So by the food which is agreeable to the
palate we often increase a bodily disease. It gratifies the taste; but
it inflames the disorder. It brings pleasure: but it also brings death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account