The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 05 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 05 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
*And if it be reasonable and necessary to deny our worldly tempers,
and live wholly unto God, because we are _certain_ that we are to die
at the end of _five years_; surely it must be much more reasonable
and necessary for us to live in the same spirit, because we have no
_certainty_ that we shall live _five weeks_.
16. *Again, if we are to add _twenty_ years to the _five_, which is,
in all probability, more than will be added to the lives of many
people, who are at man’s estate; what a poor thing it is! How small
a difference is there between five, and twenty-five years?
It is said, that a _day_ is with God as a _thousand years_, and a
thousand years as one day; because, in regard to his eternity, this
difference is as nothing.
*Now, as we are created to be _eternal_, to live an endless succession
of ages upon ages, where _thousands_, and _millions of thousands_ of
years will have no proportion to our everlasting life in God; so with
regard to his eternal state, which is our real state, twenty-five
_years_ is as poor a pittance as twenty-five _days_.
We can never make any true judgment of time as it relates to us,
without considering the true state of our _duration_. If we are
_temporary_ beings, then a little time may justly be called a great
deal in relation to us; but if we are _eternal_ beings, then the
difference of a few years is as nothing.
17. If we were to suppose _three_ different _sorts_ of rational
beings, all of _different_, but _fixed_ duration; one sort that lived
_certainly_ only a _month_, the other a _year_, and the third an
_hundred years_.
If these beings were to meet together, and talk about time, they must
talk in a very different language. _Half_ an _hour_ to those who were
to live but a _month_, must be a very different thing, to what it is
to those, who are to live an _hundred years_.
As therefore time is thus a different thing, with regard to the
_state_ of those who enjoy it; so if we would know what time is with
regard to ourselves, we must consider our state.
Now since our eternal state, is as certainly ours, as our present
state; since we are as certainly to live for ever, as we are now
to live at all; it is plain, that we cannot judge of the value of
any particular time, as to us, but by comparing it to that eternal
duration for which we are created.
If you would know what _five years_ signify to a being that was to
live an _hundred_, you must compare _five_ to a _hundred_, and see
what proportion it bears to it, and then you would judge right.
*So if you would know, what _twenty_ years signify to a son of _Adam_,
you must compare it, not to a _million_ of ages, but to an _eternal
duration_, to which no number of millions bears any proportion; and
then you will judge right, by finding it _nothing_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account