The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)Wesley, John
Religion
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 14 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
St. _Chrysostom_ here, after he had shewn, that the promise of the
Comforter primarily belonged to the apostles: And who ever questioned
it? undeniably teaches, That in a secondary sense, it belongs to all
Christians: To all _spiritual men_, all who _keep the commandments_.
I appeal therefore to all mankind, whether his authority, touching the
promise of our Lord in those texts, does not overthrow the proposition
it was cited to prove?
Although your lordship names no other author here, yet page 42. you say,
“The assigned sense of these passages was confirmed by the authority
of _Origen_.” It is needful therefore to add, what occurs in his works,
with regard to the present question.
He occasionally mentions this promise of our Lord, in four several
places. But it is in one only that he speaks pertinently to the point
in hand, (Volume II. page 403. Edition Benedictine.) where his words
are these:
_When the Spirit of truth is come, he will guide you into all truth,
and he will teach you all things._ “The sum of all good things consists
in this, that a man be found worthy to receive the grace of the Holy
Ghost. Otherwise, nothing will be accounted perfect in him, who hath
not the Holy Spirit.”
Do these words confirm that “sense of those passages that your lordship
had assigned?” Rather do they not utterly overturn it? And prove, (as
above) that although this promise of our Lord, _primarily_ belongs to
the apostles, yet in the _secondary_ sense, it belongs (according to
_Origen_’s judgment) to all Christians in all ages?
17. The fourth text mentioned as belonging to the first Christians
only, is _Romans viii. 15, 16:_ and page 26. it is said, “This
interpretation is confirmed by the authority of the most eminent
fathers.” The reader is particularly referred to _Origen_ and _Jerom
in locum_. But here seems to be a mistake of the name. _Jerom in locum_
should mean, _Jerom_ upon the place, upon _Romans viii. 15, 16._ But
I cannot perceive that there is one word upon that place, in all St.
_Jerom_’s works.
Nor indeed has _Origen_ commented upon it any more than _Jerom_. But he
occasionally mentions it in these words:
“He is a babe who is fed with milk――but if he seeks the things that are
above――without doubt he will be of the number of those, who _receive
not the Spirit of bondage again unto fear, but the spirit of adoption_,
through whom they _cry, Abba Father_.” Volume I. page 79.
Again, “The fulness of time is come――when they who are willing, receive
the adoption, as _Paul_ teaches in these words, _Ye have not received
the Spirit of bondage again unto fear; but ye have received the Spirit
of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father!_ And it is written in the
gospel according to St. _John_, _To as many as received him, to them
gave he power to become the sons of |God|, even to them that believe in
his name._” Volume I. page 231, 232.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account