The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)Wesley, John
History
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
* And with regard to the _arts_ and _sciences_: How few understand
so much as the general principles of _Logick_? Can one in ten of the
clergy (O grief of heart!) or of the _masters_ of _arts_ in either
university, when an argument is brought, tell you even the _mood_ and
_figure_ wherein it is proposed? Or _compleat_ an _Enthymeme_? Perhaps,
you do not so much as understand the term: supply the _premiss_ which
is wanting, in order to make it a full _categorical syllogism_. Can
one in ten of them demonstrate a _problem_ or _theorem_ in _Euclid’s
Elements_? Or define the common terms used in _metaphysicks_? Or
intelligibly explain the first principles of it? Why then will they
_pretend_ to that learning, which they are conscious to themselves they
have not? Nay, and censure others who have it not, and do not _pretend_
to it? Where are sincerity and candour fled?
* It will easily be observed, that I do not depreciate _learning_ of
any kind. The knowledge of the _languages_ is a valuable talent; so is
the knowledge of the _arts_ and _sciences_. Both the one and the other
may be employed to the glory of God, and the good of men. But yet I ask,
Where hath God declared in his word, that he _cannot_, or _will not_
make use of men that have it not? Has _Moses_, or any of the prophets
affirmed this? Or our Lord? Or any of his apostles? You are sensible
all these are against you. You know the apostles themselves, all except
St. _Paul_, were ανδρες αγραμματοι και ιδιωται· common, unphilosophical,
unlettered men.
9. “What! Then you make yourselves, _like the apostles_.” Because this
silly objection has so often been urged, I will for once spend a few
words upon it, though it does not deserve that honour. Why, must not
every man, whether clergyman, or layman, be in some respects _like
the apostles_, or go to hell? Can any man be saved, if he be not holy,
_like the apostles_? A follower of them, as they were of Christ? And
ought not every preacher of the gospel, to be in a _peculiar_ manner
_like the apostles_, both in holy tempers, in exemplariness of life,
and in his indefatigable labours for the good of souls? Woe unto
every ambassador of Christ, who is not _like the apostles_ in this!
In holiness; in making full proof of his ministry; in spending and
being spent for Christ! We _cannot_ and therefore we _need_ not be like
them, in _working outward miracles_. But we may and ought, in _working
together with God_ for the salvation of men. And the same God who was
always ready to help _their_ infirmities, is ready to help _ours_ also.
He who made them _workmen that needed not to be ashamed_, will teach us
also _rightly to divide the word of truth_. In this respect likewise,
in respect of his _having help from God_, for the work whereunto he is
called, every preacher of the gospel is _like the apostles_. Otherwise
he is of all men most miserable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account