The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)Wesley, John
History
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
Hence probably it was, that the _Jews_ themselves never urged it as an
objection to our Lord’s preaching (even those who did not acknowledge
or believe, that he was sent of God in an _extraordinary_ character)
that he was no _priest_ after the order of ♦_Aaron_. Nor indeed could
be; seeing he was of the tribe of _Judah_.
♦ “Aron” replaced with “Aaron”
Nor does it appear, that any objected this to the apostles. So far
from it, that at _Antioch_ in _Pisidia_, we find _the rulers of the
synagogue sending unto Paul and_ Barnabas, strangers just come into
the city, _saying, men and brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation
for the people, say on_, Acts xiii. 15.
If we consider these things, we shall be the less surprized at what
occurs in the 8th chapter of the _Acts_: _At that time there was a
great persecution against the church, and they ♦were all scattered
abroad_: (i. e. all the _church_, all the believers in Jesus)
_throughout the regions of_ Judea _and_ Samaria. (verse 1.) _therefore
they that were scattered abroad, went every where preaching the word_,
(verse 4.) Now, what shadow of reason have we to say, or think, that
all these were _ordained_ before they _preached_?
♦ “where” replaced with “were”
12. * If we come to later times; was Mr. _Calvin_ ordained? Was he
either priest or deacon? And were not most of those whom it pleased God
to employ in promoting the _reformation_ abroad, _laymen_ also? Could
that great work have been promoted at all in many places, if _laymen_
had not preached? And yet how seldom do the very _Papists_ urge this,
as an objection against the _reformation_? Nay, as rigorous as they are
in things of this kind, they themselves appoint, even in some of their
strictest _orders_, that “if any _lay-brother_ believes himself called
of God, to _preach_ as a _missionary_, the superior of the _order_,
being informed thereof, shall immediately send him away.”
* In all _protestant_ churches it is still more evident, that
_ordination_ is not held a necessary _prerequisite_ of preaching:
for in _Sweden_, in _Germany_, in _Holland_, and, I believe, in
every _reformed_ church in _Europe_, it is not only _permitted_ but
_required_, that before any one is _ordained_, (before he is admitted
even into _deacon_’s orders, wherever the distinction between priests
and deacons is retained) he should publickly preach a year or more _ad
probandum facultatem_. And for this practice, they believe they have
the authority of an express command of God: _Let these first be_ proved:
_then let them use the office of a_ deacon, _being found blameless_, 1
Timothy iii. 10.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account