The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)Wesley, John
History
The works of the Rev. John Wesley, Vol. 15 (of 32)
Wesley, John
Methodist Church; Theology -- Early works to 1800; Theology -- History -- 18th century
23. “In _England_, however, there is nothing of this kind; no _layman_
permitted to speak in public.” No! Can you be ignorant, that in an
hundred _churches_ they do it continually? In how many (particularly
in the _West_ of _England_) does the _parish-clerk_ read one of the
lessons? (In some he reads the whole service of the church, perhaps,
every Lord’s day) and do not other _laymen_ constantly do the same
thing, yea, in our very _cathedrals_? Which being under the more
immediate inspection of the _bishops_, should be patterns to all other
churches.
Perhaps it will be said, “But this is not _preaching_.” Yes, but it
is, essentially such. For what is it to _preach_, but _præedicare
verbum Dei_? To publish the word of God? And this _laymen_ do all over
_England_; particularly under the eye of every bishop in the nation.
Nay, is it not done in the universities themselves? Who _ordained_ that
singing-man at _Christchurch_? Who is likewise utterly unqualified for
the work, murdering every lesson he reads? Not even endeavouring to
read it as the word of God but rather as an old song? _Such_ a _layman_
as this, meddling at all with the word of God, I grant is a scandal to
the _English_ nation.
* To go a step farther.――――Do not the fundamental constitutions of the
_university_ of _Oxford_, the _statutes_, even as revised by archbishop
_Laud_, require every _batchelor of arts_, nine in ten of whom are
_laymen_, to read three _public lectures_ in moral philosophy, on
whatever subject he chuses? My subject, I well remember, was, The LOVE
of God. Now, what was this but _preaching_?
* Nay, may not a man be a _doctor of divinity_ even in _Oxford_, tho’
he never was _ordained_ at all? The instance of Dr. _Atwell_, (late)
rector of _Exeter college_, is fresh in every one’s memory.
These are a few of the considerations that may readily occur to any
thinking man on this head. But I do not rest the cause on these. I
believe it may be defended a shorter way.
14. * It pleased God by two or three ministers of the church of
_England_, to call many sinners to repentance: who, in several parts,
were undeniably turned from a course of sin, to a course holiness.
The ministers of the places where this was done, ought to have received
those ministers with open arms: and to have taken them who had just
begun to serve God, into their peculiar care; watching over them in
tender love, lest they should fall back into the snare of the devil.
Instead of this, the greater part spoke of those ministers, as if
the devil, not God had sent them. Some repelled them from the Lord’s
table: others stirred up the people against them, representing them
even in their public discourses, as _fellows not fit to live; papists,
hereticks, traitors; conspirators_ against their king and _country_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account