I. 2. 145. Considering the carelessness with which a plural demonstrative pronoun was used with reference to a singular noun and _vice versa_, we have not altered the reading of the old editions in order to accommodate the construction to modern rule. See note (IV) to _Love's Labour's Lost_. NOTE XI. I. 2. 259. The misprint in Rowe's second edition remained uncorrected by Pope, Theobald, Hanmer, Warburton, and Johnson. Capell in correcting the error made another by writing 'her' for 'the.' He printed his edition not from any former text, but from a manuscript of his own writing. Another instance of the facility with which a misprint which makes sense escapes correction is found in II. 1. 4, where 'put,' a misprint for 'pull' in the Variorum of 1821, was retained by many subsequent editors, Mr Collier, Mr Singer, &c. NOTE XII. I. 2. 278. Mr Grant White believes the whole of the foregoing scene to be by some other hand than Shakespeare's. Coleridge and Sidney Walker also held that large portions of the play were not from the master's hand. It appears to us impossible to discriminate, as in _Henry the Eighth_ and _The Two Noble Kinsmen_, what parts were due to Shakespeare and what to another hand. The feeblest scenes of this play seem to have been touched by him. The probability is that he worked, in this case, not with, but after, another. NOTE XIII. II. 1. 403. Pope inserts from the old play: '[_Sly speaks to one of the servants._ _Sly._ Sim, when will the fool come again? _Sim._ Anon, my lord. _Sly._ Give's some more drink here--where's the tapster? here Sim, eat some of these things. _Sim._ So I do, my lord. _Sly._ Here Sim, I drink to thee.' These lines were repeated by all subsequent editors down to Capell, who inserted them at a different place. See note (XVI). NOTE XIV. III. 2. 63. Mr Collier says that the Quarto reads 'the humor _or_ fourty fancies...' If so, his copy differs from ours, which reads 'the humor _of_ fourty fancies...' NOTE XV. III. 2. 81-84. It is not always clear from the way in which Capell's text is printed whether he meant a passage where there is a rapid change of speakers to be read as prose or verse. In the Edition before us, this is always explained by certain conventional symbols inserted with his own hand in red ink. This he probably did with a view to a second edition, which he never lived to bring out. 'Tulit alter honores.' NOTE XVI. III. 2. 245. Capell here inserted the lines which Pope put after II. 1. 403. See note (XIII). NOTE XVII. IV. 1. 124. Theobald first printed 'Where is the life that late I led?' as part of a song. He printed also the following words, 'Where are those--' in italics, as if they were a continuation of the song. He was followed by Hanmer, Warburton, and Johnson, but not by Capell. As the song is lost, the question must remain doubtful. NOTE XVIII.