Again, does not the author of the “Principles of Terrestrial Physics”
prove too much? He admits that 3,000 years ago the climate of England
was tropical: he does not deny that a subsequent period of intense cold
intervened, 2,550 years ago. He admits historical records, and 2,350
years ago Pythagoras constructed his cosmography of the world, which has
never been seriously impugned; and yet he has no suspicion that
countries so near to his own had changed their climates first from
tropical to glacial, and back again to a temperate zone. It is not
reasonable to believe this parable.
The school of philosophy generally considered to be the most advanced in
modern science has yet another view of cosmogony, of which we venture to
give a brief outline. Space is infinite, says the exponent of this
system,[9] for wherever in imagination we erect a boundary, we are
compelled to think of space as existing beyond it. The starry heavens
proclaim that it is not entirely void; but the question remains, are the
vast regions which surround the stars, and across which light is
propagated, absolutely empty? No. Modern science, while it rejects the
notion of the luminiferous particles of the old philosophy, has cogent
proofs of the existence of a luminiferous ether with definite mechanical
properties. It is infinitely more attenuated, but more solid than gas.
It resembles jelly rather than air, and if not co-extensive with space,
it extends as far as the most distant star the telescope reveals to us;
it is the vehicle of their light in fact; it takes up their molecular
tremors and conveys them with inconceivable rapidity to our organs of
vision. The splendour of the firmament at night is due to this
vibration. If this ether has a boundary, masses of ponderable matter may
exist beyond it, but they could emit no light. Dark suns may burn there,
metals may be heated to fusion in invisible furnaces, planets may be
molten amid intense darkness; for the loss of heat being simply the
abstraction of molecular motion by the ether, where this medium is
absent no cooling could take place.
[9] Professor Tyndall in _Fortnightly Review_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account