The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)Churchill, Winston
History
The World Crisis, Volume 1 (of 6)
Churchill, Winston
World War, 1914-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Great Britain
Not a single British ship was sunk or, indeed, seriously injured; and
our casualties did not exceed thirty-five killed and about forty
wounded, in spite of the fact that, in the words of the German
Lieutenant Tholens, ‘The English ships made the greatest efforts to pick
up the survivors.’[59] Two hundred and twenty-four Germans, many
desperately wounded, were rescued in circumstances of much danger by
Commodore Keyes on the destroyer _Lurcher_, and brought to England.
Considerably more than a thousand Germans, including the Flotilla
Admiral and the Destroyer Commodore, perished. A son of Admiral von
Tirpitz was among the prisoners. Much more important, however, than
these material gains was the effect produced upon the morale of the
enemy. The Germans knew nothing of our defective Staff work and of the
risks we had run. All they saw was that the British did not hesitate to
hazard their greatest vessels as well as their light craft in the most
daring offensive action and had escaped apparently unscathed. They felt
as we should have felt had German destroyers broken into the Solent and
their battle-cruisers penetrated as far as the Nab. The results of this
action were far-reaching. Henceforward the weight of British naval
prestige lay heavy across all German sea enterprise. Upon the Emperor
the impression produced was decisive. Thus Scheer (p. 57): ‘The
restrictions imposed on the Battle Fleet were adhered to.’ And still
more explicit, von Tirpitz (p. 357): ‘... August 28th, a day fateful,
both in its after effects and incidental results, for the work of our
navy.... The Emperor did not want losses of this sort.... Orders were
issued by the Emperor ... after an audience to Pohl, to which I as usual
was not summoned, to restrict the initiative of the Commander-in-Chief
of the North Sea Fleet: the loss of ships was to be avoided, fleet
sallies and any greater undertakings must be approved by His Majesty in
advance,’ etc. On von Tirpitz protesting against ‘this muzzling policy’
... ‘there sprang up from that day forth an estrangement between the
Emperor and myself, which steadily increased.’
The German Navy was indeed ‘muzzled.’ Except for furtive movements by
individual submarines and minelayers not a dog stirred from August till
November. Meanwhile our strength, both offensive afloat and defensive in
our harbours, was steadily and rapidly increasing.
The news of this naval action reached the French and British armies in
the dark hour before the dawn of victory and was everywhere published to
the retreating troops.[60]
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account