The World of Flying Saucers: A Scientific Examination of a Major Myth of the Space AgeMenzel, Donald H. (Donald Howard)
Science
The World of Flying Saucers: A Scientific Examination of a Major Myth of the Space Age
Menzel, Donald H. (Donald Howard)
Unidentified flying objects
On the morning of July 2, 1952, a Navy photographer and his family
were on their way to California, driving near the town of Tremonton,
Utah, not far from the Great Salt Lake. At about 11:10 A.M. the man’s
wife noticed something unusual in the sky. Stopping the car, the man
observed about a dozen shiny, disklike objects “milling around the sky
in a rough formation.” Getting out his movie camera, a Bell and Howell
16-mm. equipped with a 3-inch telephoto lens, he started photographing
the group. Just before it disappeared toward the west, one object left
the main group and headed east. The photographer obtained about forty
feet of film before the objects vanished. After developing the film, he
sent it to the Air Force for evaluation, together with his opinion that
the objects had been huge and had traveled at very high altitude at
supersonic speeds. This was only an impression, however, for as he told
investigators from ATIC: “There was no reference point in the sky and
it was impossible for me to make any estimate of speed, size, altitude,
or distance.”[VI-8] The pictures are of such poor quality and show
so little that even the most enthusiastic home-movie fan today would
hesitate to show them to his friends. Only a stimulated imagination
could suggest that the moving objects are anything but very badly
photographed birds.
The movies show nothing that can be recognized--merely bright blurs of
light moving at random. Their luminosity is not constant, and the spots
fade out and then become bright again. The frames include no clouds,
no trees, no house, no hill--no known reference point by which to
calculate the altitude, size, or distance of the moving lights. After
exhaustive study the photographic experts concluded that the negatives
had not been tampered with and that, unlike the Lubbock stills, the
pictures had been made exactly as described. But pictures of what? The
objects were not balloons and not planes. At the time, the experts
also rejected the theory that they might be birds because, in their
[mistaken] opinion, birds could not produce such bright reflections.
If the Tremonton movies contained no proof that the objects were birds,
still less did they contain proof that they were round machines from
outer space, and ATIC finally classified the sighting as “Unknown.”
Later, however, Captain Ruppelt noted the strong resemblance to sea
gulls he observed “riding a thermal” in the sky above San Francisco.
They were “so high that you couldn’t see them until they banked just
a certain way; then they appeared to be a bright white flash, much
larger than one would expect from sea gulls.” [VI-10, p. 290]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account