The World of Flying Saucers: A Scientific Examination of a Major Myth of the Space AgeMenzel, Donald H. (Donald Howard)
Science
The World of Flying Saucers: A Scientific Examination of a Major Myth of the Space Age
Menzel, Donald H. (Donald Howard)
Unidentified flying objects
The details of this sighting obviously show a striking resemblance to
some of those in the Mantell case (p. 33), in which the UFO and the sun
had the same bearing from the pursuing plane as in the Salt Lake City
incident. With the information now available, there can be little doubt
that Mantell was actually chasing a Skyhook balloon. But in 1948 when
so many of the relevant facts were not known, the sundog theory was a
reasonable solution and may still be the correct one.
_Bright Spots on Films_
A bright blur, a ring of light, or a circular image something like the
typical disk-shaped flying saucer sometimes appears on a film, much to
the surprise of the photographer, who had not noticed any such object
when he took the picture. These UFOs are usually caused by reflections
from unnoticed drops of moisture in the air or by defects in the
camera itself (see Figure 17). If the source of the image is something
peculiar, it may pose a real problem (see Plates VIIIa and b).
[Illustration: _Figure 17._ Distorted images produced on film by lens
defects. A, True image; B, image produced by poor lens, not well
figured; C, by astigmatism; D, coma; E, off-axis beam; F, off-axis beam
and coma.]
On July 24, 1957, an American tourist in Norway snapped a picture of a
group of houses on a cliff above the seacoast, and was amazed to find
some time later that the print showed a large white, doughnut-shaped
object hovering in the sky above the coast. Puzzled by this apparent
evidence of a saucer that had been visible to the camera but not to
her, she submitted the facts to ATIC investigators. Thorough study
of the negative, the camera, possible sources of reflection in the
landscape at the time the photograph was taken, all failed to account
for the mysterious intruder. Obviously not a cloud, the image closely
resembled a smoke ring, but the photographer had not been smoking
and there were no sources of smoke in the neighborhood. The experts
were baffled until one of them thought of a new possibility and again
questioned the witness: had she by any chance been wearing a ring when
she took the picture? She had--a sparkling diamond. If the angle of
the sun, the direction she was facing, and the position of her ring
finger in relation to the camera lens and to the sun had been exactly
right, the annular image would have been reflected into the lens at the
instant she snapped the picture. The resulting bright ring would look
exactly like the UFO that appeared on the negative[XII-1] (see Plate
VIIb).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account