The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon — John Shaqi
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
In the meantime, the presence of a Macedonian force in Asia Minor had
awakened the Persians to the danger confronting them of an invasion
from Greece. Its full meaning was hardly appreciated, and the new
situation was interpreted as only another example of the type of attack
so frequently made by the Greek communities ever since the time when
the Persian invasion of Greece had been successfully blocked. It had
always been found possible to avoid a serious attack from Greece on
the Persian Empire by playing off one Greek state against another.
This well-tried expedient was now used again. Letters were sent from
the King of Persia to the states of Greece urging them to rise against
Macedon, and offering large sums of money to subsidize the revolt.
Sparta alone responded to the invitation; Athens and the other states,
which had just renewed a formal alliance with Macedon, seemed to
realize the hopelessness of an anti-Macedonian movement, and refused to
accept the offer of Persian money. All that the representatives of the
great king could accomplish in this direction was to leave in the hands
of Demosthenes the sum of three hundred talents, with the understanding
that he could use his own discretion in employing it to the best
advantage in the interests of Persia.
The action of the great Athenian orator in accepting the Persian gold
has been severely criticised and warmly defended. It must be remembered
that to him Alexander appeared only as the destroyer of Greek liberty
and not as the protagonist of Greek culture, a position which can be
understood only as the result of his conquests in the East. There was
no reason why an Athenian patriot should have been willing to destroy
the Persian Empire at the cost of the enslavement of his own city.
The perils and difficulties of the Illyrian campaign were magnified by
the rumors which reached the Greek cities. It was even reported that
Alexander had been slain and his army destroyed. This report was soon
followed by an uprising in Thebes against the Macedonians. The leaders
of the Macedonian faction were murdered and the Macedonian garrison
in the citadel closely besieged. The democratic constitution was
then restored and Theban officials were elected according to the old
constitutional forms. At this juncture, Demosthenes used some of the
Persian treasure to purchase arms, which he sent to Thebes to aid its
citizens in their contest for the restoration of their independence.
While the Thebans were most active, the rest of Greece was not slow in
showing its antipathy to Macedonian control. Athens prepared itself to
do battle for Greek autonomy; the isthmus of Corinth was occupied by
an army raised from among the Arcadian cities, with Mantineia at their
head. And the people of Elis and Ætolia showed that they would be ready
to aid the Thebans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account