The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The religious conditions of the peace were especially obnoxious to
the Saxons, who were firmly attached to the faith of their fathers.
They had a simple form of nature worship, that displayed itself in a
passionate reverence for trees and mountains, regarded as the concrete
expression of the powers governing the world. The new expedition of
the Franks practically took the form of a crusade; for Charles saw in
the gods of the Saxons only demons inimical to the Christian faith.
Starting from Worms and accompanied by a large number of ecclesiastics,
who were to war against Saxon paganism, the Frankish army, seemingly,
met not resistance, and Charles took and destroyed without difficulty
the Saxon shrines Irminsul and Eresburg. He withdrew, satisfied
now that there was no hindrance in the way of winning the land to
Christianity. The character of the expedition is accurately indicated
in a brief sentence from the life of Sturm: “He [Charles] gave the
servants of the Lord power for teaching and baptizing.”
The Saxons, before the Franks retired beyond the Rhine, renewed
the terms of peace previously concluded with Pippin, gave hostages
for their good behavior, and seemingly made no protest against the
introduction of the Church hierarchical system in their land. But
the war with the Lombards gave the Saxons the opportunity of casting
aside their pledges; they did not desire Frankish ascendancy, and,
still less, Christian missionaries. The real situation on his Eastern
frontier was so patent that as soon as the Italian expedition had
ended with the annihilation of the Lombard kingdom, Charles (775) set
out to war on the Saxons, resolved either to force them to accept
Christianity or to destroy them as a people. His attack was skilfully
and rapidly managed; one of their strong places, Sigiburg, was taken,
and Eresburg, previously captured, was turned into a Frankish citadel.
The Saxons hesitated to strike back until the Franks were withdrawing
across the Weser. Near Brunisberg, where they contested the passage of
the Frankish army, the Saxons were outnumbered and decisively beaten.
Marching with picked troops Charles advanced into the territory of the
Eastphalians, where their leader, Hessi, hastened to take the oath of
fidelity to the Frankish monarch and gave hostages. The same method of
forcing a capitulation was tried successfully with the Saxon tribe, the
Angarians.
But meanwhile, the Westphalians had assaulted the Frankish camp in
their land, and had been able to occupy it partially. They were forced,
however, to withdraw, and while they were retreating they were met by
the division of the Frankish army under Charles, and were defeated; so
they were obliged to accept the same terms as the Eastphalians and the
Angarians. Within a short period the overlordship of the Franks had
come to be recognized by the three leading tribes of the Saxon people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account