The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
There seemed to be a fear at this time lest the popular Saxon leader,
Witikind, who had failed to appear at the assembly, might organize a
pagan revival, and so head a successful revolt against the Franks.
This fear was realized, for the drastic character of the new religious
legislation only provoked the opposition it was designed to meet.
Witikind soon returned to his people and quickly organized a revolt.
The character of the struggle showed itself in attacks on the Christian
missionaries, and in the destruction of the newly erected churches,
the places selected for bishoprics and abbeys suffering most. This
insurrection was for a time successful, and a Frankish army, through
the divided counsels of those who were leading it, was defeated and
forced to retreat. But the personal appearance of Charles on the field
was enough to turn the tide and was followed by the defeat of the
Saxons and by pacification according to the familiar terms.
The question was what to do with those who had taken up arms. It was
decided to put to death all who had united with the heathen against
the Christians. This merciless penalty was applied in its fullest
rigor. Those who were taken captive in the revolt numbered in all four
thousand; and of these, five hundred were beheaded at Verden, a savage
act of retaliation which disgraces the memory of Charles, and which
even the crudeness of the times cannot excuse. Besides, it did not
accomplish its purpose, for it only embittered those who were related
by kin or by friendship to the massacred Saxons. The revolt against
the Franks hitherto had never been universal, but now the whole people
rose en masse with sudden determination. Yet even with this temper
they were not hardy enough to take the offensive; so, while they were
preparing to resist, Charles, by a quick movement, surprised them, and
divided their army by his unexpected onslaught. But the first battle,
though unfavorable to the Saxons, was not decisive. The second ended
in a complete victory for the Franks, who took many prisoners and much
booty. The backbone of Saxon resistance was now broken, and Charles
with his army marched through the whole territory as far as the Elbe.
In all these Saxon campaigns, three victories stand out above the rest,
dividing the monotonous levels of revolt, conquest, and pacification.
The first, at Brunisberg, opened a way into Saxon territory for the
Frankish army; the second, at Bocholt, brought about the suppression
of a partial insurrectionary movement; the third, on the Hase, settled
the fate of paganism in Germany. But the state of the Saxon country
required constant watching, and we find Charles taking up his station
at Eresburg in 784-85, ready to repress any incipient movement of
revolt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account