The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Life at court was anything but austere; even the Emperor himself
could not be accused of being overscrupulous in his morals, for after
the death of Liutgarda, in 800, he contracted several irregular
alliances. Charles was fond of traveling; undoubtedly economic and
political reasons may account for the number of royal residences.
But his favorite seat was at Aix, which attracted him on account
of its mineral springs. Here, in a cluster of buildings, secular
and ecclesiastical, of his own creation, he was able to gratify
his own tastes in amusements, which were swimming and hunting. He
was fond of festivities, and liked to live surrounded by his large
family, who helped him to enjoy the good cheer of his table and
entered sympathetically into the natural atmosphere of a court
which was without stiff convention, and which preserved in its naïve
unconstrainedness the tastes of a great Teutonic tribal chieftain. But,
while the wines, the abundant amount of solid food and numerous dishes
of pastry, were well appreciated, there was serious conversation,
and an opportunity was given to the “littérateurs” of the court to
show their skill in verse or repartee. The Emperor himself reverenced
learning, but his own education was anything but advanced, even for
his own day. His intellectual interests were varied, theological
speculation being especially attractive to him. He was fond of singing,
and he spoke easily, clearly, and with an abundant diction. He knew
Latin, and understood, too, a little Greek. When he was of adult age he
studied rhetoric, logic, and astronomy. He liked to have the ancient
historians read to him when he was at table, but his favorite book
was St. Augustine’s “City of God.” Affable and easily approached, his
guests found him personally interested in their affairs; he had a happy
way of saying the right thing at the right time, but he was fully
conscious that his position as Roman Emperor made him a successor of
the Cæsars, and he never forgot that the religious consecration of the
Church placed him, in a mystic sense, in the sacred line of David and
of Solomon.
VII THE CONSTITUTION OF THE EMPIRE
Though we speak of an empire founded by Charles the Great, the use
of the word should not be allowed to lead us astray into comparisons
or analogies based on merely verbal resemblances. Charles was not an
emperor of the type known to the Roman Empire of the classic Christian
period, nor as a ruler can he be compared with Russian Czars or
Napoleon the First. Neither as king nor as emperor was Charles an
absolute monarch. Both before and after the assumption of the more
exalted title, the association of personal rule with the leadership of
the armed host of the Frankish nation was so close and intimate that
the ruler was not to be separated from the source of his authority. The
house of the Karlings could not claim the kind of sanction given to the
Merovingian princes, who were the hereditary rulers of the Franks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account