The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
When the power of the tribal kingship was broken, the Carolingian
house took first the leadership of the armed Frankish host, and then
the title of King; but they did so through, and with the consent of,
the nation of the Franks. The Karlings were not true successors of the
Merovingians. Their royal dignity had quite a different character; it
did not rest on birth and custom, or the traditional reverence which
comes from ancient and long recognized rights of succession. The army
of the Franks gave the directorship over their nation to the father
and grandfather of Charles, but the source of this authority remained
with and through the army. The leader of the Franks, whether called
king or emperor, ruled his own people, and the territory he gained,
by the consent of the army of the Franks. Charles Martel divided his
territories at his death, but he asked the army’s consent, and when
Pippin was crowned by the Pope, the act was again ratified by the army.
In the early years of Charles’ own reign, it was the wish of the Franks
that they should be guided by one ruler, not by two, and in all but
one of the conquests of Charles, the principle that some portion at
least of the annexed nation should ask him to be their overlord was
accepted. Even in the case of the Saxons, where the resistance to the
Franks was universal and unanimous, the purpose of Charles was not a
personal conquest of a people to be governed afterwards as dependents
under an absolute ruler. Rather, as Einhard expresses it, “that united
with the Franks they might along with them be made one people.” This
declaration in itself explains the character of the empire founded by
Charles. The closest analogy to it is to be found in the Ostrogothic
kingdom of Theodoric; the difference being that Theodoric sought for
allies among the independent tribal Germanic kingdoms, while the aim of
Charles meant absorption of these kingdoms under the one ruling race of
the Franks.
This principle is perfectly illustrated in the treatment of the Saxons
after their conquest; the moment they accepted the rule of the Franks
they were admitted on an equality with the Franks into the regular
meetings of the armed host of the Frankish nation, and along with their
conquerors took part in its legislative work. These primitive popular
assemblies had originated as the Merovingian dynasty was drawing to
its close, when it was realized that the people must provide for their
own concerns because of the failure of the ruling house to govern
efficiently or successfully. They were held generally in May at a royal
villa or palace in the Rhine Valley, Aix, Worms, or Mainz. In theory
every Frank was supposed to be present. Actually, only the great lords
and the high ecclesiastics were at hand, and their followers stood for
the people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account