The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
In July, 1396, the various contingents from the Occident met the
Hungarian and Roumanian armies at Bada. Mircea, who had had personal
experience with the Turkish military power, advised, with the wisdom
that comes from defeat, a policy of defensive action, that the allies
should wait for Bajesid’s advance into Hungary. But this dilatory
program was not acceptable to the Western knights, who declared that
they were there to fight, not to waste time in the inaction of a camp.
Accordingly the army went down the Danube to Ossovo, and the river was
crossed near the so-called Iron Gates.
After winning some initial successes in a land where only the garrisons
were Turkish, the crusaders, on September 12, reached Nicopolis, a
place well fortified and strongly held by a veteran Ottoman general,
Dogon-beg, who commanded a garrison of seasoned troops. At first the
French knights tried to take the place by storm; but there were not
enough ladders. It was, therefore, resolved to starve it out. The siege
was in progress when Bajesid arrived from Constantinople. When he heard
of the danger of his general he burnt his siege machines and hastened
to Nicopolis. The crusaders would not at first believe that the Sultan
was marching upon them; those who first reported the news in the camp
were treated as spies and had their ears cut off. When it was found to
be true, the Christians massacred the prisoners already taken.
In preparing for the battle there was a fatal diversity of views.
Sigismund wished to put Mircea’s men in the first line, since they
were not regarded as good warlike material; next to this division he
wished to station the Hungarians, and then, as the chief support of the
whole, the knights from the West. But the French would hear nothing of
this plan, which they regarded as equivalent to an insult; the place
in front belonged, they thought, to them by right. A few of the most
experienced counselors of John of Burgundy agreed with Sigismund, but
nothing could be done to persuade the mass of the French warriors to
give way. In the Ottoman army there were no differences of opinion;
the Sultan’s vassals were answerable to his command, and, it is to be
noted, that Stephen, the young Servian despot, with a contingent of
trained warriors, fought for Bajesid against the crusaders. But with
this exception the Sultan’s army, in all reckoned at 110,000, was
composed of Moslem troops. Out of the 110,000 ranged on the other side,
there were about 20,000 crusaders, of whom 16,000 were French. These,
with the bravado that came from the traditions of western chivalry,
undertook to bear the brunt of the fighting. Sigismund again tried to
secure the adoption of his more cautious plan, but without result. The
constable of France, Count d’Eu, gave the signal to advance, and the
French knights moved to the onslaught with cries of “Vive St. Denis,
Vive St. George.” Sigismund’s army, composed of trusty Transylvanians,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account