The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
In the meantime, however, Memnon had not been inactive, and he was
putting to good use his superiority in naval strength. Several islands
had either been occupied or were making preparations to join the
Persian general, and even in continental Greece the anti-Macedonian
influence was being felt. There was no question that Memnon’s arrival
on the shores of European Greece would be the signal for a general
abandonment of the Macedonian cause. Athens even sent an embassy to
Darius, although the city did not dare to join the Persians openly. In
the midst of these successes, Memnon was taken ill and died. Those who
succeeded him in the command showed none of his capacity. The fleet
was kept in inactivity, and though on land some small successes could
be put to the credit of the Persian arms in Asia Minor, the soldiers
operating there were soon directed to join the main army of Darius
in Syria, now being collected to meet the advancing Greeks. When the
news of Alexander’s victory at the Granicus reached the interior of
the Persian Empire, Darius began to draw together a large army, and
leaving Babylon in January, reached northern Syria in autumn. Alexander
was still in Cilicia, detained in Tarsus by a severe illness, and on
his recovery busied himself with the conquest of some of the coast
cities. But when he heard of the advance of Darius, he marched trough
the narrow pass near the coast which connects Cilicia and Syria, and
commenced the siege of Myriandros, the first Phœnician city on the
road. He evidently reckoned on Darius meeting him in the level places
of northern Persia, where the latter’s cavalry could be used to its
best advantage, but Darius showed a keener strategical instinct than is
usually associated with Persian generalship. While Alexander was taking
the coast road south, Darius’ army made a northerly movement, passing
over a difficult mountain region, and so appeared in the rear of the
Macedonian army on the level plain near Issus. The Persians had a
strong position; on their right was the sea, and on their left a chain
of mountains. On the front they were protected by the deeply worn bed
of the river Pinarus. They had also constructed a line of earthworks.
The preliminary operations of the Persians were conducted with
great intelligence. By them Alexander was cut off from his base and
his position was desperate, unless he could restore his line of
communications by a successful engagement. This was no easy matter, for
the mountain defile, the Assyrian Gate, had to be passed through, a
place where the mountains and the sea are so close that there is room
only for a road. Darius had an excellent position but failed to make
any use of it. Without attempting to interfere he allowed Alexander to
march through the narrow strip of land between the mountains and the
sea and to change from a column formation into regular battle array.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account