The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
As to the army, it kept the basis marked out for it by Ala-ed-Din. The
élite body of the Janitschars still formed the chief protection of the
Sultan’s power. From the regular tribute of blood only Constantinople,
Athens, Rhodes, a few other islands, and the Mainotes, the Laconian
mountaineers, were exempted. Every five years the officers of the
Sultan passed through the villages where children of the peasants
were collected, and each fifth one was taken. Oftentimes Christian
families were glad to pay the exaction even before the tax collectors
appeared. Many of the members of the corps preserved traces of their
early faith, and so drank wine without scruple. The solidarity of the
body was maintained by exceptional privileges; their pay was large;
they had a special share of the booty, or regular donatives, and the
assurance of a pension for old age. The Janitschars were forbidden
to marry or to engage in any trade. They could be punished only by
their own officers, and even the grand vizier had no jurisdiction
over them. In the time of Souliman they numbered 12,000, and as their
numbers increased their turbulence grew. Selim attempted to meet this
difficulty by incorporating in their body 7000 of the palace servants,
and by dividing the command.
In the government of the subject peoples no uniformity was observed.
The inhabitants of mountain regions, the Albanians, the Montenegrins,
the Mainotes, the dwellers on Mt. Libanus, were protected from
tyrannical actions. Where the country was level, there were no bounds
to the barbarity of Turkish governmental methods. The vassal states,
such as Transylvania, Moldavia, Georgia, were still ruled by native
princes. But under Ottoman rule, in spite of the constant wars and the
attendant anarchic conditions, there was worked out a crude kind of
unity throughout the Empire. At least, with an Ottoman overlord, there
prevailed a condition of internal peace between the various portions of
the Empire, that gave stability to commercial relations and rendered
communication easy between distant parts. Religious persecution in
the sense in which it had existed in the Byzantine Empire, and in the
Eastern domains of the Italian municipalities, was now unknown. At
Rhodes the Greeks preferred the new régime to the rule of the Knights
Hospitalers, who, as Latins, had showed no sympathy with the Orthodox
Church. In Crete and Greece the Turks were more popular as masters than
the Venetians; and the Servians, Hungarians, and Roumanians preferred
Moslem control to that of Catholic Austria.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account