The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Economically, the substitution of Turkish for Byzantine rule was a
benefit to the Greek industrial population, who were better protected
against foreign competition than they had ever been. Customs duties
were arranged by an ad valorem scale, under which the Italian merchants
were taxed four and a half times as much as the native Christians,
although these, in turn, paid more than the Moslem traders who were
favored by the Ottoman government. The Greek parts of the Empire
entered upon an era of prosperity such as had not been seen since
before the Latin conquest of Constantinople. For example, a large
colony of Greeks established themselves at Ancona, where, in 1549, they
transacted business to the annual value of 500,000 ducats. Moreover,
the persecution of the Moors and Jews of Spain brought much capital
into Ottoman territory; soon there were numbered 30,000 Spanish Jews at
Constantinople, and 15,000 to 20,000 at Salonica. On this commercial
basis the national renascence of the Greek peoples was founded. The
landed proprietors of their own race mostly became Moslems, while their
scholars and literary men found a refuge in the Occident; but the
traders made and kept a place for themselves. Hence there was created a
new center in which the old ideals of an independent Greek nationality
could grow.
The Slav peoples were much worse off than the Greek population, because
over their provinces were scattered Turkish garrisons, and through them
passed the roads used by the Sultan for the interminable expeditions
into Hungary. They retained fewer traces of autonomous existence,
and their clergy were more ignorant than the Greek. The higher
ecclesiastical positions were never bestowed on Slavs, and their landed
gentry mostly became Moslem. The Roumanians, who were more remotely
situated, preserved, under the form of vassalage, a complete national
organization. They paid a moderate tribute, and were obliged to furnish
military contingents, but there were no Turks in their territory, and
no mosques were built among them. Wallachia and Moldavia, in the time
of Souliman, made more than one attempt to throw off Turkish rule, but
both principalities were compelled to submit before the middle of the
sixteenth century.
The Turkish conquest of North Africa begins, strictly speaking, with
the resistance of the Moslem Berber tribes and princes to the extension
of Spanish influence over the African Mediterranean coast towns. This
was a primary object of Charles V, who was bent on following up, by
his control of sea power, the expulsion of the Moors from Spain. After
many vicissitudes, Kheir-ed-Din, who had a powerful rival supported by
the Spaniards, became King of Algiers. He turned to ask help from the
Sultan of Constantinople, Selim, and he offered, in return, to become
his vassal and to incorporate his small kingdom as an integral part of
the Ottoman Empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account