The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
On Alexander’s part there was no haste in turning to the interior.
Instead of following Darius, he remained on the sea coast, while
Parmenio was sent to Damascus with half the Greek army, to seize the
treasure left there by Darius before the battle of Issus. Alexander
with the rest of the army turned south to the conquest of the great
island city of Phœnicia, which unlike its smaller neighbors had refused
to surrender and had declared its neutrality to Alexander. Tyre was the
center of Persian sea power, and so long as it remained independent its
fleet could be used against the Greek king, either on the sea itself or
as an instrument for creating disturbances in continental Greece.
The siege of Tyre involved special difficulties; not only were its
walls high and strong, but it was situated on an island separated
from the mainland by a shallow body of water. As Alexander had no
fleet adequate to conduct aggressive operations from the open sea
against the city, he planned to bring up his siege engines against
the walls from the land side, by building a causeway over the shallow
body of water. The defenders of the town tried repeatedly and with
great bravery to prevent such an approach from being made. Tyre’s own
commercial competitors, Cyprus and the less important Phœnician cities,
including Sidon, placed their navies at Alexander’s disposition, and
with their ships he began to operate from the sea. The situation of the
town was desperate, but its people made a defense as desperate and as
resourceful as their daughter city Carthage in later days against the
Romans.
When the causeway was finally constructed, the walls on this side,
being 150 feet high and enormously thick, were not damaged by the
siege engines. Accordingly Alexander changed his plans quickly; the
engines were mounted in vessels and a breach was effected in one of the
battlements extending along the harbor. While the Macedonians were now
able to penetrate the city, they met with heavy resistance from the
besieged townsmen, and the occupation of Tyre was only effected by the
protection of Alexander’s naval allies, who forced an entrance into the
two harbors, and so drew off a portion of the defenders from the side
where the Greeks were making their attack. The stubborn defense cost
the Tyrians 8000 men, and of the prisoners 3000 were sold as slaves.
On the Macedonian side the loss was small, only amounting to 400 men,
but no mention is made of the losses of the allied fleets. The siege of
Tyre lasted seven months, the city falling in July, 332. The long delay
was worth while, for the successful issue showed how invincible was the
generalship of the Greek leader. By the possession of the city he held
the key to the control of the eastern Mediterranean.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account