The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon — John Shaqi
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Up to this point the march of Alexander had been through territories
which the Persians had themselves acquired by conquest, and which had
been long exploited by their satraps. The populations were, therefore,
not inimical to the new conquerors. Indeed, as we have seen in many
cases, the latter were greeted as deliverers from the heavy yoke of the
Persians. On its side, the Macedonian army had been kept under strict
discipline, and the lives and property of the people through whom it
had passed were carefully respected. But Persepolis was really in the
enemy’s country, the cradle of Persian rule, and there was no chance
of reconciling its inhabitants by kind treatment. They were now to
feel the brunt of real warfare. The city was given up to plunder, and
the royal citadel of the Achæmenian kings was burnt down in a drunken
revel. This ruthless act has been condemned, and it does appear to have
been the result of a moment of excess, not planned as part of a policy
of repression, for Alexander ordered the flames quenched, though he
himself had cast the first firebrand that had set the costly cedar work
of the palace in flames.
These various military operations lasted far into the autumn. When
winter came the sorely tried and traveled Greeks took four months’
rest, and from this point begins another stage in the expedition, for
Persis was regarded as sufficiently pacified to allow the bulk of the
army to march into Media. Here Darius was preparing to make a last
stand, but his efforts to collect a new army had the somewhat pitiful
result of bringing to his standard a force of not more than 3000
horsemen and 6000 foot soldiers. As the Greeks approached, he fled
before them, recognizing the hopelessness of resistance. He seemed
minded to take refuge in the extreme limits of what had been his
empire, the province of Bactria. Without striking a blow, Alexander
occupied Ecbatana, the last of the great Persian capitals.
All that now remained was to round off the conquest by capturing the
person of the defeated monarch, and to force the satraps of the eastern
provinces to accept the new régime. This program offered no serious
military problems, but it was bound to consume time and required
patience. Many of the non-Macedonian Greeks were now sent home, after
receiving generous rewards for their service, and Parmenio was left
at Ecbatana, while Alexander with the best of his troops set off to
pursue Darius. Hurrying on by Ragæ, a place a little to the south of
the modern capital of Persia, Alexander found there that the royal
fugitive had already passed through the Caspian Gates into the regions
of Parthia. Bactria was still much farther to the east. The followers
of Darius, with the exception of a few faithful Greek mercenaries,
determined to hand over their unlucky monarch as a prisoner to the
satrap of Bactria, Bessus, a kinsman of his, and to trust to his
initiative to organize a national resistance more effectively than
Darius.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account