The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon — John Shaqi
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Three years had now passed since the death of Darius; Alexander had
done in the interior of Asia a work which no western conqueror has
accomplished since on so large a scale. Even to-day the effective
occupation by Russia of the lands once included in the Persian
Empire falls short of Alexander’s achievement, because Afghanistan,
included in his conquests, is still an autonomous state. It will have
been already noticed that much attention had to be given while the
Macedonian army was in these Far Eastern provinces, to their protection
against the nomad tribes on their frontiers. These operations in
Bactria and Sogdiana were a necessary part of the conquests of Persia,
since these remote provinces acted as a barrier against the savage
tribes of the central Asiatic steppes, who might at any time by joint
action overrun the civilization of the regions south of them. The
special care shown by Alexander in the construction of settlements
in this region is an evidence of his desire to make them centers of
civilizing influence by which the restless herdsmen might be trained to
orderly methods of life. The experiment failed, but it was a brilliant
vision--a vision which might have become a reality if the conqueror had
lived the normal span of years.
The beating down of all opposition in the enormously extensive
empire which the defeat of Darius had laid at his feet had now been
accomplished. If Alexander had been a statesman and nothing else, he
would have stayed his hand, because the consolidation of the territory
he had overrun was a work demanding the time and the talents of the
greatest genius. But Alexander had not the temper of a Roman proconsul,
capable and zealous to solve large political problems. He was young
enough to be influenced by the spirit of adventure, and unlike Cæsar
and Napoleon, had sometimes no deeply laid scheme in his military
exploits.
There was no political or military necessity summoning Alexander
to the conquest of India, but there was the irresistible charm of
novelty exerted by the unknown, the ambition to penetrate into
regions untrodden before by any Greek, and with this feeling of the
conqueror the modern world is able to sympathize. He was lured also by
the legendary stories of the visits to India of the god Dionysus and
the hero Herakles. The mystical, superstitious traits in Alexander’s
character could easily be stimulated, as we have already seen, to
emulation with the divinities of his people, and he was also glad to
afford proof that he could effect a conquest attempted without success
by Cyrus and Semiramis.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account