The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
No Greek statesman for a hundred and fifty years, say roughly from 500
B.C. to 350 B.C., the most brilliant period of Greek history, regarded
the kingdom of Macedon as anything but a negligible quantity. Macedon
itself was a land that lay on the boundaries of the Hellenic world.
Its people were held to be half Hellenic and half barbarian. Even
to-day scholars are not at one on the question whether the Macedonian
dialect can be reckoned as properly belonging to Greek speech. But
it was this alien power that ended in bringing Greece to a kind of
unity, a unity based on the force of arms. The most remarkable feature
of this achievement lies in the fact that it was accomplished by one
man, Philip of Macedon, who began his victorious career in 359 B.C. by
repressing internal disturbances at home and by dealing effectively
with his warlike neighbors, the Illyrians and the Thracians. The
divisions in Greece gave him the opportunity of intervention there.
He posed as the friend of the oligarchic party in various Greek
communities, and made it his aim to oppose by diplomacy and by war the
most important center of Greek democracy, Athens. The final struggle
between the free states and the Macedonian monarchy took place at the
battle of Chæronea, August, 338 B.C. Philip won a decisive victory,
because he had spent years in training a professional army that proved
irresistible when it faced the best citizen soldiers of Athens,
Thebes, and other smaller towns which, persuaded by the eloquence of
Demosthenes, stood side by side in the defense of liberty. Philip
survived his victory only a short time, dying in 336 B.C. as the master
of Greece and leaving to his son Alexander the heritage of his unique
achievements.
II THE CONQUEST OF GREECE
Alexander’s succession to the throne of Macedon seemed secured by his
father Philip’s sincere personal affection for him. His confidence in
Alexander’s ability, even in his son’s early youth, was manifested
in the assignment to him of the most responsible positions under his
father’s directions. Philip saw to it that his son should be carefully
educated by placing him under the charge of Aristotle. Good reports
must have come of his precocity, because Philip, while he was occupied
in the siege of Byzantium, handed over to Alexander, then only sixteen
years old, the administration of Macedon. Two years later, at the
battle of Chæronea, already mentioned as marking the downfall of Greek
freedom, the youth was placed at the head of the division of the army
which took the offensive at a critical part of the engagement, and
it was through this important command that the questionable honor of
striking the decisive blow in the defeat of the allied forces of free
Greece was ungrudgingly conceded to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account