The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The hint of a reaction was not an oratorical commonplace; it was
suggested by the recent history of Rome itself, and proved most
effective, for even Cicero’s own brother, Quintus, who followed Cæsar,
expressed his agreement with him. Cicero himself, in his reply, took
a rather wavering position, paying special attention to the practical
proposals of Cæsar, which so many modern historians have decided to
be weak and specious. But these have forgotten that, even if Cæsar’s
plans for keeping the prisoners as perpetual ticket-of-leave men in
various Italian communities offered no effective guarantee that they
would not escape, there was no especial reason for fearing their
presence again in Rome after Catiline and his army had been destroyed.
None of the conspirators was a man of first-rate ability, and besides,
the experience of unsuccessful conspiracy has almost as strong an
educational effect as imprisonment. Many Paris communards settled down
as peaceful citizens.
Cicero made an unfortunate experiment at this juncture. The Senate
listened readily to the summary appeals for justice to traitors
made by Cato, but Cicero’s execution of the Catilinarians was stored
up against him in the popular mind, and much of the good he might
have done in his political career was frustrated by his weakness in
identifying himself with the blind passion of the reactionary party.
For the moment, however, Cicero carried the people with him; they lost
their heads, alarmed by the wild tales of conflagration and massacre.
Cæsar’s life was in danger, because he had pleaded for a policy of
moderation, and it must be allowed that the words of his speech did not
represent a pose. The principles he stood for in 63 he adhered to after
the civil wars were over, when a word from him might have initiated a
proscription after the Sullan model.
II ALLIANCE WITH POMPEIUS AND CRASSUS
The year following the suppression of the Catiline conspiracy was one
of uncertainty. Pompeius was returning home after his six years’ stay
in the East. The question was whether he would play the rôle of a new
Sulla. It seems generally to have been expected that he would. There
was no army in Italy strong enough to resist his will; certainly the
force which had overcome Catiline near Fiesole was quite unequal to
such a work. The question was, who were to be his friends and what
policy would he pursue. One of the general’s emissaries appeared in
Rome, and made it clear that Pompeius could not be used as a mere tool
of the senatorial party. Cicero made tactless overtures to secure his
favor, and met with a cold reception.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account