The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Cæsar showed more diplomacy, paying the general the compliment of
requesting him to finish the Capitoline temple, one of the chief
shrines of the civic religion of Rome. This duty came within Cæsar’s
province as Pontifex Maximus, and besides as Prætor for this year
he held a position which made his influence useful to the returning
general. Both the scheme for the restoration of the temple and a
measure for recalling Pompeius to the city, which was supported by
Cæsar, were opposed by the Senate, and the discussion led to such
violence that the Senate suspended Cæsar from his functions as
magistrate, and only restored him when he had personally intervened to
quiet the passions of the mob.
Though Cæsar’s year of office was over (61 B.C.), and the time had
come for him to administer Spain as Proprætor, that being the province
assigned him, he delayed his departure. There were many grounds for
this course. Pompeius had been keeping his own counsel as to his
future plans, and required watching. Cæsar had difficulties with his
creditors; he had long been heavily in debt, and his year of office,
with its sensational political activities, must have severely drained
his resources.
But the chief cause which delayed his journey west was the violation,
in the House of the Pontifex Maximus, of the sacred mysteries of the
Bona Dea by a young Quæstor-elect, Clodius, who was suspected of being
the lover of Cæsar’s wife, Pompeia. A scandal involving the head of the
state religion was a serious matter, and Cæsar lived up to the rôle
assigned him by sententiously remarking that Cæsar’s wife ought not
even to be suspected and by seizing this opportunity of divorcing her.
The step satisfied public opinion at the time, but the dignity of the
act is somewhat lessened in the eyes of later critics from the fact
that the Pontifex Maximus himself was, even according to the flexible
standards of Rome, notorious for his moral laxity.
When Clodius’ trial was held, Cæsar diplomatically denied that he had
any certain knowledge of the case. Politics were so much involved in
this trial that proscriptions might have been initiated. Clodius was
a figure in the popular party, and, in the end, by the common method
of bribing the judges, an acquittal was secured. Pompeius, in the
midst of this exciting time, had arrived in Rome, thus giving Cæsar
an opportunity of taking the measure of the over-praised Eastern
conqueror. Before Cæsar left for Spain, mutual advances had taken
place, and he felt sure that Pompeius would not ally himself with the
senatorial party. Cæsar also continued to be on good terms with the
millionaire Crassus, and before leaving Italy he borrowed from him
eighteen hundred talents to satisfy the demands of creditors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account