The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
But now the opposition to him took another form. A determined
aristocrat, M. Calpurnius Bibulus, who, apart from his political
tenets, had a long-standing personal grudge against Cæsar, was put up
by the senatorial party as his colleague for the consulship, and was
elected by the lavish use of money. Cæsar’s next move in this game of
political strategy was a master stroke of astuteness; he formed a close
combination with Pompeius, whom the senatorial party had just irritated
by vetoing all his pet schemes, among them an opportunity of a second
consulship and a plan to reward his soldiers by a distribution of
public lands. As a third member of the alliance Crassus was introduced,
a valuable asset because of the great financial backing he could give.
He saw a chance for promoting his political advancement with two such
colleagues to help him. It was a frank system of give and take; there
were no strong personal ties between any of the three members of the
junta, but they had at least a common opponent, the senatorial party.
An effort was made, though it was unsuccessful, to detach Cicero from
his friendly relations with the aristocratic majority in the Senate;
as he declined the invitation, the new political machine became a
triumvirate, the union of three influential persons to overcome
opposition and to prevent the wheels of public business from being
blocked by the endless methods of obstruction ever ready to be employed
in the complicated system of Roman government, where the checks were
more numerous than the balances. It simply meant that these three men,
and not the reactionary senators, should decide on the distribution of
provinces, on the candidates for offices, and on the command of armies.
From the record of all three, it was clear that the technique of the
constitutional system would not be treated with great reverence, for
all were practical politicians and had definite personal ambitions to
gratify.
As Consul, Cæsar began his year of magistracy with a policy of studied
moderation. He tried to get on with Bibulus by showing him marked
consideration in the way of official precedence, and his first reform
of senatorial practice concerned a subject which might well have been
taken as a non-controversial matter, the publication of the Senate’s
proceedings. Cæsar proposed that a summary of each debate should be
exposed to view in the Forum. It was an intimation to the senators that
they must hold themselves responsible to public opinion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account