The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The next proposal was to make some arrangement by which the veterans of
Pompeius’ army should be supplied with public lands. These lands had
to be acquired by the state from private owners, so the proceeds of
the extensive conquests of Pompeius’ conquests in the East were to be
applied to this purpose. The Senate refused to listen to any agrarian
measure; the very name frightened them. Cato obstructed, trying to talk
the scheme out in the Senate. Cæsar, who had as little respect for
parliamentary procedure as Cromwell, put a stop to this copious oratory
by placing the speaker under arrest. He was soon released, however, in
deference to the pressure of his colleagues.
In the face of the hopeless opposition of the Senate to the Consul’s
legislation, the only course left to pursue was for Cæsar to present
his legislation directly to the popular assembly, without the
authorization of the Senate. This method was extraordinary, but not
absolutely illegal, and it had been employed by reformers since the
time of Tiberius Gracchus. There were, of course, grave objections to
it, for measures could be rushed through without proper discussion, and
it is well known that hasty legislation is often dangerous, even for
those who promote it. A specially drastic feature of the agrarian bill
was the clause which compelled senators and all officers, to be elected
in future, to swear to be faithful to its provisions.
In this way Cæsar hoped to secure his measure from being abrogated
when the year of his magistracy was over. This clause was not,
however, a new expedient, but it was now being used in a new way to
prevent the claim that prerogatives of the Senate had been violated by
passing legislation without consulting its wishes. Pompeius promised
to support the bill by arms if violence were resorted to on the other
side. A Tribune exercised his right to veto on the measure, when it was
introduced in the popular assembly, but this old constitutional check
was contemptuously disregarded. Also, when Bibulus, the conservative
colleague of Cæsar, interfered by formally delaying action in the
measure, he was forcibly removed from the Forum by some of Pompeius’
veterans. Bibulus was equally powerless when he invoked religious
scruples of a technical kind, for Cæsar was Pontifex Maximus as well
as Consul. Bibulus’ interpretations of signs and omens were ruled out
as irregular. Even when the bill was passed by the people, he kept up
opposition in the Senate and tried to induce the senators to declare
the agrarian law null and void. They, however, were not prepared to
join him in such a hazardous undertaking, so in disgust he withdrew for
the rest of his term into private life. His retirement led the people
to remark jokingly that the two Consuls for the year were Julius and
Cæsar, not Cæsar and Bibulus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account