The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Whatever happened at Ægæ, the fruits of the crime fell into Alexander’s
hands. He had been officially proclaimed his father’s heir. Of Philip’s
sons he was the only one who had been tested on the battlefield, and
he was also the one who had already shown capacity for leading the
state in such crises as were bound to result from his father’s murder.
Philip’s old companions in arms did not hesitate for a moment as to
the proper choice of a ruler. Alexander was immediately recognized as
king, and in the selection special weight was attached to the fact that
his cause was urged by Antipater, one of Philip’s closest friends and
supporters.
In this way the young prince’s road to the succession was made easy;
there were no disturbances, and care was also taken that there should
be no competitors for the crown in the future, for the young son of
Cleopatra was killed. But these grim measures to establish domestic
peace did not stop here. There was another line of Macedonian princes,
descended from the dethroned family of Lynkestes; there were two
members of this house who might, by making awkward claims at unsuitable
times, give much trouble. These two, Heromenes and Arrhabæos, were
both executed, on the ground that they had acted as accomplices
with Pausanias in the conspiracy against Philip. They had a brother
Alexander, whose life was spared only because he was a son-in-law of
Antipater and had hailed Alexander as the new king immediately after
the murder.
By these deeds of violence, Alexander became the acknowledged master
of Macedon, but the prospects outside his own country were anything
but favorable. In Asia, Attalus was at the head of the Greek cities.
As the uncle of Cleopatra he would naturally be a most bitter enemy
of Alexander. The uncertain future in Macedon was not lost on those
Greeks whose liberties Philip had so recently destroyed, and whose
acquiescence in the rule of Macedon was due only to their fear of
the conqueror. Now they were ready to throw off the yoke, needing
no excuse, but only an opportunity of rising, which the advent to
the throne of an untried youth made most hopeful. A revolt broke
out in Ambrakia and the Macedonian governor was driven out. Thebes
was preparing for a similar outbreak, and there were plain signs of
restlessness in Ætolia and in the Peloponnesus.
Athens was the city to which all the opponents of Macedonian rule
looked for sympathy and support. The peace party there, who had gained
adherents among the Athenians because of the moderation shown by
Philip after his decisive victory at Chæronea, now lost ground because
patriotic hopes sprung anew to life at the unexpected death of the man
who had shattered the traditional system of Greek city autonomy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account