The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
Marcellus, one of the Consuls in B.C. 51, a determined opponent of
Cæsar, brought matters to a climax by denouncing Cæsar in the Senate
as a brigand and asking that he should be called a public enemy unless
he gave up his province by a fixed date. These motions were made as a
result of the debate whether a successor to Cæsar should be appointed;
they were carried by an imposing majority. An equal majority rejected
the motion that Pompeius should be required to resign.
Curio, who had as Tribune interposed his veto on the first motion, then
offered a resolution by which both commanders should be required to
resign. This was carried by 322 to 320, but no effect was given to it;
probably it was vetoed by a Pompeian Tribune. Through private channels,
efforts were being made to prevent a break between the two rivals; on
account of Pompeius’ well-known indecision of temper, the senatorial
clique resolved by a bold stroke to prevent further negotiations.
Marcellus, on the 9th of December, using as a pretext the rumor that
Cæsar was on his way to Rome with his army, tried in vain to get the
Senate to declare Cæsar a public enemy and to authorize Pompeius to
take command of the troops in Italy and protect the state. Indignant
at the timidity of the senators, he took matters in his own hands,
virtually declaring war on his own responsibility, for he handed over
the two Italian legions to Pompeius, with the command to march against
Cæsar. Pompeius, though this action of the Consul was unconstitutional,
accepted the commission; at the end of the month he was still confident
that Cæsar would drop his claim to the consulship and that so peace
would be restored.
Cæsar acted cautiously; he sent for additional troops from Gaul and
also despatched a message to the Senate offering to resign all his
provinces and his army, provided Pompeius would do the same. In case of
refusal, he said he would be compelled to take measures for asserting
his own rights and the freedom of the Roman people. Curio was sent with
this ultimatum to Rome; it was only with difficulty that the letter was
read. A motion was passed that at a fixed date Cæsar should give up his
army and that his non-compliance would be treated as an act of war.
There was, of course, the usual obstruction from Marcus Antonius, a
Cæsarian Tribune; the final decree by which martial law was introduced
and the magistrates called upon to see “that the commonwealth took no
harm,” was not passed till the seventh of January. (49 B.C.) Lentulus,
the Consul, in the meantime had advised the obstructing tribunes to
leave the city if they valued their personal safety. It was this verbal
threat which put in Cæsar’s hands the very useful plea that he was
acting as the defender of the freedom of the Roman people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account