The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, NapoleonBevan, Wilson Lloyd
History
The world's leading conquerors : $b Alexander the Great, Cæsar, Charles the Great, the Ottoman sultans, the Spanish conquistadors, Napoleon
Bevan, Wilson Lloyd
History; Kings and rulers
The military strength of the two parties was, from the senatorial
point of view, altogether on their side; they had, they reasoned, the
whole empire to draw upon for recruits, while Cæsar had only his own
province. The difficulty of the senatorial position was, that their
forces were not together when the war broke out. Of Cæsar’s original
thirteen legions, two were now under Pompeius’ command; besides this,
the latter had in Spain seven legions of well-seasoned troops; in Italy
he had the two legions already mentioned, which originally belonged to
the army of Gaul; and another in a state of creation.
Cæsar’s chance lay in prompt action, in administering a decisive
defeat before Pompeius could get his scattered men together. While
the negotiations were in progress, he had only one legion in northern
Italy; but two had been sent for, and when they were at hand Cæsar
had, with his allies, about 20,000 men, a force considerably superior
to that of Pompeius, who was especially careful not to lead Cæsar’s
old legions against their former commander. With one legion of newly
recruited men he could do nothing; the consequence was that in Italy
there was practically no resistance to Cæsar’s advance. When some of
the newly created cohorts joined him, the senators with their commander
fled to Greece.
The moral effect of the abandonment of Italy and the capital was a
great asset for the Cæsarian party. The critics have condemned Pompeius
because he failed to relieve the senatorial troops inclosed by Cæsar in
the town of Corfinium in the Abruzzi. It was a discouraging blow at the
very commencement of the struggle for the senatorial party to see their
soldiers and one of their chief partisans, Domitius Ahenobarbus, left
to their fate. But Pompeius was in no position to give help; if he had
attempted to give aid, he would have been defeated and captured.
Instead of pursuing Pompeius across the Adriatic to Greece, Cæsar
turned away to the conquest of Spain. Even if transports were lacking,
he might have doubled round the Adriatic coast through Illyria, his
own province. He might soon have got the control of the entire East
before a sufficient force was collected to oppose him. But if he had
done so, in the meantime Italy would have been exposed to an invasion
from Pompeius’ Spanish veterans, for the senatorial commander would
undoubtedly have betaken himself there and acted on the offensive.
By the time Cæsar could reach Antioch, in Syria, Pompeius could have
occupied Rome. Cæsar therefore consistently followed the principle of
striking at the enemy’s force where it was concentrated and prepared
for effective work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account