The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of Europe — John Shaqi
The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of EuropeBénézet, Louis Paul
History
The World War and What was Behind It; Or, The Story of the Map of Europe
Bénézet, Louis Paul
Europe -- History; World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
In the second place, it must be noted that the king was not the
direct master of all the people. Only the great lords had sworn
homage to him. He was lord of the dukes, earls, and barons. The
less important barons swore homage to the great barons, and the
knights, squires, retainers, and yeomen swore homage to the
lesser barons. If a lesser baron had subdivided his fief among
certain knights and squires, the peasants owed allegiance, not to
him, but to the squire to whom they had been assigned. Thus, if a
“man” rebelled against his lord, all of his knights, retainers,
etc., must rebel also. If, for instance, a great duke refused to
obey his king and broke his oath of allegiance, all his little
barons and knights must turn disloyal too, or rather, must remain
loyal, for their oaths had been taken to support the duke, and
not the king. History is full of such cases. In many instances,
dukes became so powerful that they were able to make war on even
terms with kings. The great Dukes of Burgundy for a time kept the
kings of France in awe of their power; the Duke of Northumberland
in 1403 raised an army that almost overthrew King Henry Fourth of
England; the Duke of York, in 1461, drove Henry Sixth from the
throne of England and became king in his place.
[Illustration: William the Conqueror]
A strange case arose when, in 1066, William, who as duke of
Normandy had sworn homage to the king of France, became, through
conquest, king of England. His sons, great-grandsons, and
great-great-grandsons continued for one hundred and fifty years
to be obliged to swear allegiance to the French kings in order to
keep the duchy of Normandy. It was as if the Governor of Texas
had led an army into Mexico, conquered it, and become Emperor of
that country, without resigning his governorship or giving up his
American citizenship.
Two things which tended to break down the feudal system and bring
more power to the common people were, first, the invention of
gunpowder, and, second, the rise of towns. A man with a musket
could bring down a knight in armor as easily as he could the most
poorly armored peasant. Kings, in fighting to control their great
lords, gave more freedom to citizens of towns in return for their
help. The king’s armies came to be recruited largely from
townspeople, who were made correspondingly free from the feudal
lords.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account