The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflictMarshall, Logan
History
The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflict
Marshall, Logan
Europe -- History -- 1789-1900; Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
The Treaty of London in 1852 had maintained the union of Holstein with
Denmark, but did not put a definite end to the demands of the Germans,
who held that it was a constituent part of Germany. The quarrel was
renewed in 1855 over a common constitution given by King Frederick VII
to all his states. This was abolished in 1858, and afterwards the Danes
sought to grant complete autonomy to the duchies of Schleswig and
Lauenburg, this movement being with the purpose of making more complete
the union of Schleswig with their country. This step, taken in 1863,
led to a protest from the German diet.
In all this there was food for an indefinite contest, for, on the one
hand, Schleswig did not form a part of the Confederation, but, on the
other, certain historical bonds attached it to Holstein, and its
population was mixed. The death of Frederick VII (November 15, 1863),
who was succeeded by a distant relative, Christian IX, further
complicated the quarrel. The duke of Augustenburg claimed the three
duchies, though he had previously renounced them. The German diet, on
its part, wanted the Danish constitution abolished in Schleswig.
The dream of the petty German states hostile to Prussia, and especially
of the Saxon minister, Von Beust, was to strengthen their party by the
creating of a new duchy. Bismarck admirably outplayed everybody. He
knew that the great Powers were at odds with one another over Poland.
He, on the contrary, could count on Russia’s friendship and the
personal aid of Queen Victoria, whom Prince Albert had completely won
over to pro-German ideas. He used England to make Christian IX consent
to the occupation of Holstein, which, he said, was in reality an
acknowledgment of that king’s rights. At this stage, had the Danes
yielded to the necessities of the situation and withdrawn from
Schleswig under protest, the European Powers would probably have
intervened and a congress would have restored Schleswig to the Danish
realm. Bismarck prevented this by a cunning stratagem, making the
Copenhagen government believe that Great Britain had taken a step
hostile to that government. There was no truth in this, but it
succeeded in inducing Denmark to remain defiant. As a consequence, on
the 1st of February 1864, the combined forces of Prussia and Austria
crossed the Eider and invaded the province.
It was a movement to regain to Germany a section held to be non-Danish
in population and retained by Denmark against the traditions and will
of its people. Austria, which did not wish to appear less German than
Prussia, though the matter did not directly appeal to that country,
joined in the movement, being drawn into it by Bismarck’s shrewd
policy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account