The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflictMarshall, Logan
History
The world war : $b a history of the nations and empires involved and a study of the events culminating in the great conflict
Marshall, Logan
Europe -- History -- 1789-1900; Europe -- History -- 1871-1918; World War, 1914-1918 -- Causes
It was not the original intention to go beyond the borders of the
duchies and invade Denmark, but when Christian IX tried to resist the
invasion this was done. The Danewerk and the Schlei were forced, and
the Danish army was defeated at Flensburg and driven back into Dueppel,
which was taken by assault. A conference of the great Powers, opened at
London (April 25th to June 25th), brought about no result. Napoleon III
did not refuse to act, but he wanted as a condition that England would
promise him something more than its moral support, which it refused to
do. Finally Jutland was invaded and conquered, and Van Moltke was
already preparing for a landing in Fuenen when Christian IX gave up all
the duchies by the Vienna preliminaries (August 1st), confirmed by
treaty on October 30th following.
CONQUEST OF THE DUCHIES
The fate of the conquest remained to be decided upon. Bismarck settled
it, after a pretence of investigation, by concluding that the rights of
King Christian over the duchies were far superior to those of the duke
of Augstenburg, who had a hereditary claim, and that as Prussia and
Austria had won them from the king by conquest, they had become the
lawful owners. An agreement was made in which Holstein was assigned to
Austria and Schleswig to Prussia, and for the time the question seemed
settled.
BISMARCK’S WIDER VIEWS
This was far from being the case. Bismarck held views of far more
expanded scope. He wanted to exclude Austria from the German
confederation, and to do so desired war with that country as the only
practical means of gaining his ends. In 1865 he made the significant
remark that a single battle in Bohemia would decide everything and that
Prussia would win that battle. A remark like this was indicative of the
purpose entertained and the events soon to follow.
In such a war, however, it was important to secure the neutrality of
France. The alert Prussian statesman had already assured himself of
that of Russia. To gain France to his side he held an interview with
Napoleon III at Biarritz in October, 1865. The cunning diplomat offered
the emperor an alliance with a view to the extension of Prussia and
Italy, by means of which France would take Belgium. Napoleon saw very
clearly that the offer was chimerical, but he believed that Prussia if
fighting alone would be rapidly crushed, and that the alliance of Italy
would aid him in protracting the war, thus enabling him to intervene as
a peacemaker and to impose a vast rearrangement of territory, the most
essential provision of which would be the exchange of Venetia for
Silesia. Whatever Napoleon’s views, Bismarck saw that he was safe from
any interference on the part of France, and returned with the fixed
design of driving Austria to the wall.
WAR FORCED ON AUSTRIA
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account