The Wreck of the "Royal Charter": Compiled from Authentic Sources, with Some Original MatterFowler, Frank
History
The Wreck of the "Royal Charter": Compiled from Authentic Sources, with Some Original Matter
Fowler, Frank
Royal Charter (Ship); Shipwrecks -- Wales -- Anglesey
'How the "Royal Charter" ever had the right to get into that
atrocious Dulas Bay, where the rocks stick up like jagged teeth, is
a question quite as easy to ask as it is difficult to understand
how the "Royal Charter" should have ventured to pass Holyhead in a
gale without a pilot. From Holyhead to the point where the ship
struck is _all danger_; and though with the wind off the land and a
pilot on board the course for a ship bound to the Mersey may be in
shore, was it the safe course, it may be asked, under opposite
circumstances? Yet it is not to be presumed for a moment that the
common signs of weather, or the rules for approaching land, were
deliberately set at nought, or that the weather-glasses were not
consulted, or that the tidal currents and the notorious indraught on
the Welsh coast were forgotten or neglected by the lamented
commander of the "Royal Charter" and his officers, none of whom,
alas! remain to tell the story. From the moment when it was found
that the ship could not make head against the hurricane and the
indraught, and that it was impossible to make the Mersey, the fate
of the ship needs no explanation. Blue lights and rockets were burnt
for a pilot; but, as no one who knows Welsh pilots will be surprised
to hear, no pilot appeared; and, pilot or no pilot, it was now too
late. The ship was hove to, and drifting helplessly into Dulas Bay.
Here she let go her anchors, "keeping her screw working to ease the
cables." One after the other the cables parted with the strain; at
half-past two she struck, the tide ebbing, and with the flood she
went broadside on to the shelving beach, literally split in two
amidships, and was smashed to pieces on the rocks. We are guilty of
no presumption in drawing one conclusion, and that is, the worse
than uselessness, the absolutely fatal mischief of the so-called
"auxiliary" screw. The "Royal Charter" was, it should be remembered,
an iron ship of 2,749 tons, "originally intended for a sailing
vessel," but transformed into a screw steamer, "with engines of 300
horse power." The value of these screw engines to a ship of this
size and quality seems to us at least problematical; at best it
could only serve her in making way across the "calm belts;" and as a
set off to this exceptional service, there was the dead weight of
the engines and the space they occupied, often to no purpose.
Whatever may have been the use of the auxiliary screw in calms, it
is too certain that in working off a lee shore it was not only not
serviceable, but disastrous; it not only failed to claw the ship
off, but it failed to ease the cables, and when the spars were cut
away, the screw got fouled, and ceased to work. Is it absurd or
unjust to suppose that had there been no auxiliary steam power in
the "Royal Charter" she would never have been permitted to hug a lee
shore at night in search of a pilot, with a hurricane dead on her
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account