Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
may not see; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest they
should be converted, and their sins be forgiven them.”[414] The words,
moreover, used by the Apostle Paul, that “it is not of him that willeth,
nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy;”[415] in another
passage also, “that to will and to do are of God;”[416] and again,
elsewhere, “Therefore hath He mercy upon whom He will, and whom He will
He hardeneth. Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth He yet find fault?
For who shall resist His will? O man, who art thou that repliest against
God? Shall the thing formed say to him who hath formed it, Why hast thou
made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump
to make one vessel unto honour, and another to dishonour?”[417]—these
and similar declarations seem to have no small influence in preventing
very many from believing that every one is to be considered as having
freedom over his own will, and in making it appear to be a consequence
of the will of God whether a man is either saved or lost.
FROM THE GREEK.
7. But since certain declarations of the Old Testament and of the New
lead to the opposite conclusion—namely, that it does not depend on
ourselves to keep the commandments and to be saved, or to transgress
them and to be lost—let us adduce them one by one, and see the
explanations of them, in order that from those which we adduce, any one
selecting in a similar way all the passages that seem to nullify
free-will, may consider what is said about them by way of explanation.
And now, the statements regarding Pharaoh have troubled many, respecting
whom God declared several times, “I will harden Pharaoh’s heart.”[418]
For if he is hardened by God, and commits sin in consequence of being
hardened, he is not the cause of sin to himself; and if so, then neither
does Pharaoh possess free-will. And some one will say that, in a similar
way, they who perish have not free-will, and will not perish of
themselves. The declaration also in Ezekiel, “I will take away their
stony hearts, and will put in them hearts of flesh, that they may walk
in my precepts, and keep my commandments,”[419] might lead one to think
that it was God who gave the power to walk in His commandments, and to
keep His precepts, by His withdrawing the hindrance—the stony heart, and
implanting a better—a heart of flesh. And let us look also at the
passage in the Gospel—the answer which the Saviour returns to those who
inquired why He spake to the multitude in parables. His words are: “That
seeing they might not see; and hearing they may hear, and not
understand; lest they should be converted, and their sins be forgiven
them.”[420] The passage also in Paul: “It is not of him that willeth,
nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy.”[421] The
declarations, too, in other places, that “both to will and to do are of
God;”[422] “that God hath mercy upon whom He will have mercy, and whom
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account