Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
He will He hardeneth. Thou wilt say then, Why doth He yet find fault?
For who hath resisted His will?” ”The persuasion is of Him that calleth,
and not of us.”[423] “Nay, O man, who art thou that repliest against
God? Shall the thing formed say to him that hath formed it, Why hast
thou made me thus? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same
lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?”[424]
Now these passages are sufficient of themselves to trouble the
multitude, as if man were not possessed of free-will, but as if it were
God who saves and destroys whom He will.
FROM THE LATIN.
8. Let us begin, then, with those words which were spoken to Pharaoh,
who is said to have been hardened by God, in order that he might not let
the people go; and, along with his case, the language of the apostle
also will be considered, where he says, “Therefore He hath mercy on whom
He will, and whom He will He hardeneth.”[425] For it is on these
passages chiefly that the heretics rely, asserting that salvation is not
in our own power, but that souls are of such a nature as must by all
means be either lost or saved; and that in no way can a soul which is of
an evil nature become good, or one which is of a virtuous nature be made
bad. And hence they maintain that Pharaoh, too, being of a ruined
nature, was on that account hardened by God, who hardens those that are
of an earthly nature, but has compassion on those who are of a spiritual
nature. Let us see, then, what is the meaning of their assertion; and
let us, in the first place, request them to tell us whether they
maintain that the soul of Pharaoh was of an earthly nature, such as they
term lost. They will undoubtedly answer that it was of an earthly
nature. If so, then to believe God, or to obey Him, when his nature
opposed his so doing, was an impossibility. And if this were his
condition by nature, what further need was there for his heart to be
hardened, and this not once, but several times, unless indeed because it
was possible for him to yield to persuasion? Nor could any one be said
to be hardened by another, save him who of himself was not obdurate. And
if he were not obdurate of himself, it follows that neither was he of an
earthly nature, but such an one as might give way when overpowered[426]
by signs and wonders. But he was necessary for God’s purpose, in order
that, for the saving of the multitude, He might manifest in him His
power by his offering resistance to numerous miracles, and struggling
against the will of God, and his heart being by this means said to be
hardened. Such are our answers, in the first place, to these persons;
and by these their assertion may be overturned, according to which they
think that Pharaoh was destroyed in consequence of his evil nature.[427]
And with regard to the language of the Apostle Paul, we must answer them
in a similar way. For who are they whom God hardens, according to your
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account